| I N THE FEDERAL POLICE | ) - |
| 1 |
| DISCIPLINARY | TRIBUNAL | ) |
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
I
*
4
a g a i n s t
| LLOYD MICHAEL | B I N I O N |
D E C I S I O N
| . | TR I B UNAL | Mr | J . R . B . | N o r r i s | Q . C . |
| DATE | : | 3.8 | J u n e | 1 9 8 3 |
THE TRIBUNAL DECIDES THAT:
| 1 . | L l o y d | M i c h a e l | B i n i o n | i s n o t | g u i l t y o f | t h e b r e a c h |
| d i s c i p l i n e a l l e g e d i n t h e n o t i c e d a t e d 3 0 M a r c h | 1 |
| s i g n e d b y | t h e | C o m m i s s i o n e r | o f | P o l i c e |
| R e g u l a t i o n | 19A o f | t h e A u s t r a l i a n | F e d e |
| ( D i s c i p l i n e ) | R e g u l a t i o n s , | a n d | w h i c h | b |
| n u m b e r | AFP: | 4 8 1 8 2 8 3 . |
| 2 . | L l o y d M i c h a e l | b i n i o n | i s g u i l t y o f | t h e b |
| d i s c i p l i n e a l l e g e d | i n t h e n o t i c e d a t e d |
| s i g n e d b y | t h e | C o m m i s s i o n e r | o f | P o l i c e | p u r s u a n t | t o |
| R e g u l a t i o n | 19A | o f | t h e A u s t r a l i a n F e d e r a l P o l i c e |
| ( D i s c i p l i n e ) | R e g u l a t i o n s , | a n d | w h i c h | b e a r s | i d e n t i f i c a t i o n |
| ; k g | n u m b e r | AFP: | 4 9 1 8 2 8 3 . |
| 3 . | L l o y d | H i c h a e l | B i n i o n | i s n o t | g u i l t y o f | t h e b r e a c h | o f |
| d i s c i p l i n e a l l e g e d | i n t h e n o t i c e d a t e d | 3 0 M a r c h | 1 9 8 3 |
| s i g n e d | by | t h e | C o m m i s s i o n e r | o f | P o l i c e p u r s u a n t | t o |
| R e g u l a t i o n | 19A o f | t h e A u s t r a l i a n F e d e r a l P o l i c e |
| ( D i s c i p l i n e ) | R e g u l a t i o n s , | a n d w h i c h | b e |
| n u m b e r | AFP: | 5 0 1 8 2 8 3 . |
| 4 . | T h e | p r o c e e d i n g s b e | r e m i t t e d | t o t h e Com |
| f o r t h e i m p o s i t i o n o f | a | p e n a l t y o n L l o |
| i n r e s p e c t o f | t h e b r e a c h o f | d i s c i p l i n e |
2 . a b o v e .
-___-___- - - - - -___-_- - - - -
| J . R . B . | NORRIS | Q . C . |
Y e m b e r
I N THE FEDERAL POLICE )
| DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL ) | ) | No. | 6 o f 1 9 8 3 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
a g a i n s t
| LLOYD | MICHAEL | B I N I O N |
| I N THE | MATTER | o f | t h e C o m p l a i n t s |
| ( A u s t r a l i a n F e d e r a l P o l i c e ) | A c t | 1 9 8 1 |
| C | REASONS FOR DECISION | MR J . R . B . | NORRIS | Q . C . |
| 2 8 | J u n e | 1 9 8 3 |
| C o n s t a b l e | B i n i o n | f a c e s a l l e g a t i o n o f | d i s c i p l i n a r y |
| o f f e n c e s | u n d e r | R e g u l a t i o n | 1 8 ( l ) ( d ) o f | t h e A u s t r a l i a n | F e d e r a l |
| P o l i c e | ( D i s c i p l i n e ) | R e g u l a t i o n s , | t h e | f i r s t o f | w h i c h | i s |
| a s s a u l t i n g | K e n n e t h | G e o r g e | S p e n c e r , | t h e | s e c o n d | h a r r a s s i n g |
| K e n n e t h | G e o r g e | S p e n c e r , | t h e | t h i r d h a r a s s i n g | H e r m a n | c a n | d e r | L a a n . |
| T h e | o n u s | i s t h e c i v i l o n u s | s u b j e c t t o my | t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t | t h e |
0
| g r a v i t y a n d n a t u r e o f | t h e | c h a r g e s . |
| A s t o t h e f i r s t a l l e g a t i o n o f | a s s a u l t , | I | am | n o t s a t i s f i e d |
| o n | t h e e v i d e n c e | t h a t | a n a s s a u l t i n l a w w a s | c o m m i t t e d . | Mr | S p e n c e r , |
| w h o s e | e v i d e n c e | I | a c c e p t , | w a s | s u f f i c i e n t l y f r a n k | t o c o n c e d e | t h a t | i t |
| m i g h t | h a v e | b e e n | a n | a c c i d e n t | a n d | t h a t | t h e | c o n s t a b l e m i g h t | w e l l n o t |
| h a v e | r e a l i s e d t h a t t h e l i c e n c e h a d | s t r u c k h i m | i n t h e f a c e . | I t may |
| b e | t h a t C o n s t a b l e B i n i o n w a s | o v e r - a r r o g a n t , | b u t | I | am | n o t | s a t i s f i e d |
| t h a t h e i n t e n d e d | t o s t r i k e Mr | S p e n c e r o r t h a t | h e w a s | s o i n d i f f e r e n t |
| t o w h a t | h a p p e n e d | a s t o b e u n c a r i n g . | I | d o n o t | f i n d | t h i s a l l e g a t i o n |
| p r o v e d . |
. . . / 2 .
| T h e | a l l e g a t i o n o f | h a r a s s m e n t | i s a | d i f f e r e n t m a t t e r . |
| I | h a v e z l r e a d y s t a t e d t h a t I | a c c e p t Mr | S p e n c e r a s a w i t n e s s who |
| w a s | t e l l i n g t h e t r u t h . | I n d e e d , | M r S p e n c e r | i n g i v i n g h i s a c c o u n t |
| o f | e v e n t s | i n t h e w i t n e s s b o x | a p p e a r e d | s t i l l t o b e a n g r y a n d |
| r e s e n t f u l a t h a v i n g b e e n | t r e a t e d i n t h e m a n n e r | h e d e s c r i b e d | f o r |
| n o | r e a s o n | t h a t | h e | c o u l d | c o m p r e h e n d . | C l e a r l y | C o n s t a b l e | B i n i o n | w a s |
| o v e r - a u t h o r i t a t i v e | a n d | b e h a v e d | i n a m a n n e r | u n s u i t e d | t o | a n | o f f i c e r |
| o f | t h e f o r c e . |
| T h e | n e x t | q u e s t i o n | i s : | d i d | t h i s | c o n d u c t | c o n t r a v e n e |
| R e g u l a t i o n | 1 8 ( l ) ( d ) ? | A s | I | m e n t i o n e d | e a r l i e r , | t h e s e c t i o n h a s | b e e n |
| i n t e r p r e t e d | b y | a n | e a r l i e r T r i b u n a l | ( w h i c h | t h i s T r i b u n a l | r e p l a c e d ) |
| a n d | t h e i r P r e s i d e n t | o f | t h a t T r i b u n a l f o u n d | t h a t | t h e w o r d s |
| " d i s g r a c e f u l " | a n d | " i m p r o p e r " | s h o u l d | b e | c o n s t r u e d | a s | h a v i n g | s o m e t h i n g |
| i n common. | I n t h i s l a t t e r r e g a r d i t s e e m s | t o m e t h a t o n e s h o u l d |
| c o n s i d e r | t h e m | c o l l e c t i v e l y | t o | i m p o r t | s o m e t h i n g | m o r e | t h a n | s i m p l y |
| " i n a p p r o p r i a t e | i n a | p o l i c e | o f f i c e r 1 ' b u t | s o m e t h i n g | s u c h a s t h a t |
| w h i c h may | b r i n g d i s r e p u t e t o t h e f o r c e o f | w h i c h | h e | i s a m e m b e r , |
| L | c o n n o t a t i n g | d i s h o n o u r a b l e , | i n f l i c t i n g d i s g r a c e | o r | s h a m e f u l . |
i n b r e a c h o f
| I n my | o p i n i o n h i s c o n d u c t o n | t h a t d a y w a s |
| R e g u l a t i o n | 1 8 ( l ) ( d ) . | He | s e e m e d | t o b e | a c t i n g a s M r v a n | d e r L a a n |
| d e s c r i b e d | i t , a s a man | d r u n k w i t h a u t h o r i t y . | T h e r e w a s | n o t h i n g |
| a p p a r e n t | t o me | t o j u s t i f y h i s l o s i n g h i s t e m p e r | a n d a c t i n g i n t h e |
| m a n n e r | t h a t M r S p e n c e r h a s | d e s c r i b e d . | I | f i n d t h i s a l l e g a t i o n | t o |
| h a v e | b e e n made | o u t . |
| I | t u r n | t o | t h e a l l e g a t i o n i n v o l v i n g M r v a n | d e r L a a n . |
| He | m a d e | n o | c o m p l a i n t | o f | C o n s t a b l e | B i n i o n ' s | c o n d u c t . | I n d e e d | i n |
| h i s o p i n i o n | s u c h | a l t e r c a t i o n a s | t o o k p l a c e | b e t w e e n | h e | a n d |
| C o n s t a b l e | B i n i o n | w a s | t r i f l i n g a n d | b e s t | f o r g o t t e n . | H i s v i e w | w a s |
| t h a t | i t i s c h i l d i s h t o p u r s u e | a | c o m p l a i n t | a g a i n s t C o n s t a b l e B i n i o n . |
| I | m e n t i o n | t h a t i n p a s s i n g , | n o t | b e c a u s e | i t i n f l u e n c e s m e b u t |
| b e c a u s e | h e , | i f a n y o n e , | w a s | t h e p e r s o n who | o u g h t | o t h a v e b e e n |
a g r r i e v e d .
| I | am | n o t | s u r e w h e t h e r | t h i s was | h a r a s s m e n t w i t h i n t h e |
| d i c t i o n a r y m e a n i n g | o f | t h a t w o r d , | b u t | I | am | q u i t e u n a b l e t o c o n c l u d e |
| t h a t | i t c o n t r a v e n e d | R e g u l a t i o n | 1 8 ( l ) ( d ) | i n t h e m a n n e r | e a r l i e r |
d e f i n e d .
| J . R . B . | NORRIS | Q . C . |
| - | Member |
- AGLC
- Commissioner of Police v Binion [1983] AFPDT 1
- Case
- [1983] AFPDT 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the police officer had reasonable grounds to stop and search Binion, and whether the search was conducted lawfully. The court needed to consider the applicable legal principles governing police stops and searches, including the requirements for reasonable suspicion and the proportionality of the search. Binion argued that the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to justify the stop and that the search was therefore unlawful.
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Binion based on the circumstances known to them at the time. The court noted that the officer was aware of a recent armed robbery in the area and Binion's behaviour, including his sudden departure when approached by the police, provided reasonable grounds for suspicion. The court further found that the search was conducted lawfully, as it was reasonable and proportionate to the circumstances. The evidence obtained during the search was therefore admissible.
In conclusion, the court dismissed Binion's application to suppress the evidence obtained from the search. The orders of the court were that the evidence obtained from the search of Binion would be admitted in any proceedings against him.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.