Combe v Pascoe

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Combe v Pascoe [2004] FCA 725

BANKRUPTCY – application for summary dismissal – order appealed from complied with – no matter of principle – notice of appeal dismissed

FAYE DIANE COMBE v SCOTT DARREN PASCOE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF FAYE DIANE COMBE

N 2507 OF 2003

CONTI J
3 JUNE 2004
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2507 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

FAYE DIANE COMBE
APPELLANT

AND:

SCOTT DARREN PASCOE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF FAYE DIANE COMBE
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

CONTI J

DATE OF ORDER:

3 JUNE 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.        The notice of appeal filed 22 December 2003 be dismissed.

2.        The costs of the appeal and of the motion be costs in the administration of the    bankrupt estate of the appellant.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2507 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

FAYE DIANE COMBE
APPELLANT

AND:

SCOTT DARREN PASCOE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF FAYE DIANE COMBE
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

CONTI J

DATE:

3 JUNE 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 22 December 2003, the appellant (Ms Combe) filed a notice of appeal against the whole of the judgment of Federal Magistrate Raphael given on 2 December 2003, whereby his Honour ordered Ms Combe, upon the application of Mr Pascoe as trustee in bankruptcy of Ms Combe’s property (‘Mr Pascoe’), to vacate the home property comprising an asset of her bankrupt estate.

  2. I have been informed by Counsel for Mr Pascoe that the order has been complied with by Ms Combe, in that she subsequently vacated the property.  I refused an application for a stay of the order by Ms Combe on 12 February 2004.  Subsequently the property was sold, but the proceeds of sale are apparently insufficient to pay out in full the creditors of her bankrupt estate.  The petitioning creditor was Anthony Ziade, Ms Combe’s former solicitor, to whom a significant amount was claimed to be owed for legal costs arising out of certain Family Court proceedings. 

  3. Counsel for Mr Pascoe further informed the Court that Ms Combe has been invited to withdraw the above notice of appeal, but she has not done so.  She did not appear at the appointment to settle the index, and no index has therefore been settled for the appeal. 

  4. The creditors of Ms Combe are apparently at least the following:

    (i)        Mr Ziade, hr former solicitor;

    (ii)       Acuiti Legal, the solicitors for Law Cover;

    (iii)      Mrs Combe’s former husband; and

    (iv)      Mr Pascoe’s costs of administration generally.

  5. On 12 February 2003, in addition to dismissing the notice of motion referred to in [2] above, I dismissed two other notices of motion filed by Ms Combe, one for the grant of pro bono assistance from a lawyer on the ‘Probono Panel’, and the other ‘… for leave to file…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Combe v Pascoe and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2004] FCA 725
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in Combe v Pascoe was heard by the Federal Court of Australia. The matter involved the bankruptcy of a man named Combe, with Pascoe acting as the trustee of his estate. The dispute centred on the ownership of certain funds held by the trustee and whether they should be considered part of the bankrupt estate. Specifically, the issue was whether the funds in question, which were held by Pascoe as trustee, constituted assets of Combe's bankrupt estate, or if they were held in a separate trust account and therefore not subject to the claims of Combe's creditors.

The court was required to determine whether the funds in question were indeed assets of the bankrupt estate. This required an examination of the legal relationship between the trustee and the bankrupt, as well as the terms of any trust agreements that may have been in place. The court also needed to consider whether there were any valid grounds for the appeal and whether the notice of appeal was properly filed.

The court found that the notice of appeal was defective and not properly filed. The court held that the funds in question were not part of the bankrupt estate, as they were held in a separate trust account and not subject to the claims of Combe's creditors. The court also found that there were no valid grounds for the appeal, and dismissed the appeal accordingly. The court ordered that the costs of the appeal and the motion be costs in the administration of the bankrupt estate of Combe.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The notice of appeal filed 22 December 2003 be dismissed.

2. The costs of the appeal and of the motion be costs in the administration of the bankrupt estate of the appellant.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

CONTI J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: CONTI J

Full text does not contain this section.