| [2021] FWCA 2025 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Com-Al Windows Pty Ltd
(AG2021/4235)
COM-AL WINDOWS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 14 APRIL 2021 |
Application for approval of the Com-Al Windows Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] Com-Al Windows Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Com-Al Windows Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 21 April 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 April 2025.
[4] The flexibility term in the Agreement is inconsistent with section 203(6)(a) of the Act. The model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511083 PR728603>
- AGLC
- Com-Al Windows Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 2025
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2025
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the validity and fairness of the terms of the proposed agreement. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and appropriate given the economic and operational context in which it was negotiated. Conversely, the respondents contended that certain provisions of the agreement were unjust, either because they imposed unreasonable working conditions or because they failed to adequately represent the interests of the employees. The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement was genuinely bargained for, whether it was fair and reasonable, and whether it complied with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009.
In considering these issues, the Commission examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement in detail. It assessed whether the agreement met the requirements of genuine bargaining and whether it contained terms that were fair and reasonable. The Commission also took into account the economic context, the specific needs of the enterprise, and the interests of the employees. Ultimately, the Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained terms that were fair and reasonable. It approved the Enterprise Agreement 2020, thereby resolving the dispute in favour of the applicant.
No further orders were made beyond the approval of the agreement. The decision confirmed the Commission's authority to approve enterprise agreements that meet the statutory criteria, and it provided a framework for similar disputes in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.