Colvin and Sailor

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

COLVIN & SAILOR [2020] FamCA 244
FAMILY LAW – NULLITY – Application by Husband for a decree of nullity of marriage – Where the Husband contends that the Wife was lawfully married to another person at the time of the marriage – Where it is found that the Wife was lawfully married to another person at the time of the marriage – Where the marriage was therefore void – Decree of nullity granted.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Marriage Act 1961 (Cth)
Axon v Axon (1937) 50 CLR 395
APPLICANT: Mr Colvin
RESPONDENT: Ms Sailor
FILE NUMBER: BRC 2250 of 2018
DATE DELIVERED: 17 April 2020
PLACE DELIVERED: Brisbane
PLACE HEARD: Brisbane
JUDGMENT OF: Forrest J
HEARING DATE: 23 March 2020

REPRESENTATION

THE APPLICANT: Self-Represented
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Ms Donald (by telephone)

AustralAsia Law

Orders

  1. It is declared that the Marriage between Mr Colvin and Ms Sailor solemnised on … 2012 at Brisbane in the State of Queensland it void on the ground the Respondent was lawfully married to another person at the time the said marriage was solemnised and thus the said marriage is a nullity.

  2. That pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), a copy of these Reasons for Judgment may be provided to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland in support of any submissions made on behalf of the Respondent to that Office.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Colvin & Sailor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE

FILE NUMBER: BRC 2250 of 2018

Mr Colvin

Applicant

And

Ms Sailor

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In 2012, the Applicant and the Respondent went through a civil ceremony in Brisbane solemnising marriage between them.

  2. On their Marriage Certificate issued by the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages, Queensland, the Applicant Husband’s marital status is listed as “divorced”. In fact, he had been married a few times before. At the time, he signed a declaration pursuant to the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) that he was a divorced person. The Respondent Wife’s marital status is listed as “never validly married”, she having signed a declaration that she had “never been validly married” and was not “married to another person”.

  3. The couple’s marriage relationship broke down and in May 2017 they separated on a final basis. The husband applies to this Court for a declaration of nullity in respect of their 2012 marriage. His application came on…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Colvin and Sailor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] FamCA 244
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Colvin and Sailor*, Forrest J of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered a dispute concerning the validity of a marriage. The applicant, Mr Colvin, sought a declaration that his marriage to the respondent, Ms Sailor, solemnised in Brisbane in 2012, was void.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the marriage was void *ab initio* on the ground that the respondent was already lawfully married to another person at the time of the ceremony. This question engaged the provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the grounds for declaring a marriage void.

Forrest J found that the respondent was indeed lawfully married to another person when she purported to marry Mr Colvin. Applying the relevant provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), His Honour concluded that the marriage was therefore void and a nullity from its inception. The court also made an order permitting a copy of the reasons for judgment to be provided to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland, in support of submissions made on behalf of the respondent.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

It is declared that the Marriage between Mr Colvin and Ms Sailor solemnised on … 2012 at Brisbane in the State of Queensland it void on the ground the Respondent was lawfully married to another person at the time the said marriage was solemnised and thus the said marriage is a nullity.

2.

That pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), a copy of these Reasons for Judgment may be provided to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland in support of any submissions made on behalf of the Respondent to that Office.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.