Collins v Marinovich
Case
•
[2021] QSC 175
•27 July 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Collins v Marinovich [2021] QSC 175
[2021] QSC 175
27 July 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Collins sought a declaration that a debt secured by a mortgage was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The critical issue was whether the terms of the mortgage were testamentary and overridden by the deceased mortgagee's will, or whether the debt was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee in accordance with the mortgage terms. The second respondent had the running of the critical issues at the hearing, and the first respondent acted as a contradictor on the question whether it ought to be bound by the court’s declaration.
The court found in favour of Collins, declaring that the debt secured by the mortgage was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee. The court held that the terms of the mortgage were not testamentary, and therefore the will of the deceased mortgagee did not override them. The court also held that the second respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of the proceeding, and that the first respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of paragraph 1 of the originating application filed on 12 June 2019. The court further held that it was appropriate to order that the parties’ costs be paid out of the estate, on the indemnity basis, by analogy with estate litigation.
The court made several declarations, including that the debt secured by the mortgage was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee, and that the second respondent was to execute and deliver a discharge of the mortgage within 14 days of the date of the declaration. The court also ordered that the second respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of the proceeding, and that the first respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of paragraph 1 of the originating application. The court further ordered that if the second respondent failed to deliver the duly executed discharge by the due date, the Registrar of Titles or the Registrar of this Court may execute on behalf of the second respondent the discharge upon request by Collins or her solicitors and deliver the discharge to Collins’ solicitors.
The court found in favour of Collins, declaring that the debt secured by the mortgage was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee. The court held that the terms of the mortgage were not testamentary, and therefore the will of the deceased mortgagee did not override them. The court also held that the second respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of the proceeding, and that the first respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of paragraph 1 of the originating application filed on 12 June 2019. The court further held that it was appropriate to order that the parties’ costs be paid out of the estate, on the indemnity basis, by analogy with estate litigation.
The court made several declarations, including that the debt secured by the mortgage was forgiven upon the death of the mortgagee, and that the second respondent was to execute and deliver a discharge of the mortgage within 14 days of the date of the declaration. The court also ordered that the second respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of the proceeding, and that the first respondent was to pay Collins’ costs of paragraph 1 of the originating application. The court further ordered that if the second respondent failed to deliver the duly executed discharge by the due date, the Registrar of Titles or the Registrar of this Court may execute on behalf of the second respondent the discharge upon request by Collins or her solicitors and deliver the discharge to Collins’ solicitors.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Standing
-
Limitation Periods
-
Res Judicata
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Collins v Marinovich [2021] QSC 175
Most Recent Citation
Collins v Marinovich [2023] QSC 175
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Collins v Marinovich
[2023] QSC 175
Reed v Smith (No 2)
[2022] QSC 229
In the Estate of Carluen
[2022] NTSC 80
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Frizzo v Frizzo
[2011] QSC 177
Re Estate Late Hazel Ruby Grounds; Page v Sedawie
[2005] NSWSC 1311
Shorten v Shorten (No 2)
[2003] NSWCA 60