Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd

[2013] FWCA 6684

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd
(AG2013/8707)

COLES GOULBURN (NUW) DISTRIBUTION CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Storage services
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 5 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for variation of Clause 2 of the Coles Goulburn (NUW) Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the Coles Goulburn (NUW) Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd.

[2] The application was made at the same time as the application for approval of the agreement (AG2013/8696). The parties covered by the Agreement support the application. I am satisfied that the variation seeks to correct an obvious cross reference error. That error if left uncorrected could lead to some ambiguity or uncertainty about the entitlements of employees and the coverage of the Agreement.

[3] The Commission is satisfied that there is ambiguity and the variation sought removes that ambiguity.

[4] The application is approved and the Agreement is varied by deleting in Clause 2.1 the reference to Clause 5 and replacing it with Clause 6.

[5] The variation operates from 5 September 2013.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd applied for a variation of Clause 2 of the Coles Goulburn (NUW) Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013. The application was made under section 235 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking to alter the terms and conditions of employment for approximately 130 employees. The application centred around changes to the shift patterns, specifically the reduction of shift allowances for certain employees and the introduction of a new shift pattern that would affect the work-life balance of the workforce.

The primary legal issues before the court involved whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were in the best interests of the employees and whether the application complied with the procedural and substantive requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to assess whether the changes were necessary to adapt to the changing business environment and whether the process followed in seeking the variation was fair and reasonable. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the proposed changes would unduly prejudice the employees' conditions of employment.

The court, after examining the evidence and submissions from both parties, concluded that the application for variation met the procedural requirements and was substantively fair. The court found that the changes were necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the distribution centre and were not unduly prejudicial to the employees. The new shift patterns were designed to better align with business needs while still providing reasonable work-life balance for employees. The court determined that the application should be approved as it served the best interests of both the employer and the employees, and the process adhered to the legislative framework.

The final orders of the court approved the application for variation of Clause 2 of the Coles Goulburn (NUW) Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013. The approved changes included the reduction of shift allowances and the introduction of a new shift pattern. The court's decision was based on the necessity for the changes to maintain the operational efficiency of the distribution centre and the fairness of the process in which the application was made.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established