Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cohen v Woolworths Ltd [2018] NSWCATCD 11 Hearing dates: 12 March 2018 Date of orders: 24 April 2018 Decision date: 24 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, General Member Decision: 1 The Respondent, Woolworths Ltd, 1 Woolworths Way Bella Vista NSW 2153 Australia, is to pay the Applicant, Peter Cohen, 10 Freya Crescent Shalvey NSW 2770 Australia, the sum of $2,316.50 within 14 days of the date of these orders.
2 The claim is otherwise dismissed.Catchwords: CONSUMER CLAIM – alleged supply of particle contaminated fuel – where contamination caused motor vehicle engine failure – claim for costs of cleaning fuel lines and engine repairs – claim for travel costs during period motor vehicle inoperative
COSTS – special circumstances – cost of fuel analysis reportLegislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Fair Trading Act 1987
Fuel Standards Management Act 2000Cases Cited: Alexander James Pty Ltd v Pozetu Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 75
Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336
CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21
eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94
Farquar & Farquar (No. 2) [2008] FamCA 682
Hadley v Baxendale [1854] 9 Ex 341
Medtel Pty Limited v Courtney 198 ALR 630
Miller v Minister for Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372
Profitability Consulting Pty Ltd v Thorpe [2018] NSWCATAP 41
Nguyen & Anor v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd; Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Nguyen & Anor (No.2) [2016] NSWCATAP 168Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Peter Cohen (applicant)
Woolworths Ltd (respondent)Representation: Applicant in person
Mr Soham Lakhia, Acting Supply Chain Manager, for Respondent
File Number(s): GEN 17/45137 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
-
This is an application by Peter Cohen (the applicant) for an Order from the Tribunal pursuant to section 79N of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (FT Act) that will require Woolworths Ltd (the respondent) to pay him the sum of $2,532.78 being compensation for motor vehicle repair and travels costs he incurred because of damage to his motor vehicle which was allegedly caused by particle contaminated fuel supplied to him by the respondent. The applicant also seeks an order pursuant to section 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NCAT Act) that would require the respondent to pay his costs of obtaining a fuel analysis report which he contends was necessary for him to prove his claim before the Tribunal, which was $115.01. This application was made to the Tribunal on 23 October 2017 (the application).
-
For reasons that are set out following, the Tribunal has determined on the evidence before it that the fuel supplied by the respondent to the applicant on 25 July 2017 was not of acceptable quality contrary to the consumer guarantee contained in section 54 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL
Continue reading Cohen v Woolworths Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cohen v Woolworths Ltd [2018] NSWCATCD 11
- Case
- [2018] NSWCATCD 11
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the fuel supplied by Woolworths contained particles that caused the engine failure, and if so, whether Woolworths was liable for the resulting costs. The court had to consider the evidence regarding the condition of the fuel, the cause of the engine failure, and the expenses claimed by Cohen. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of special circumstances regarding the cost of the fuel analysis report.
The court found that the fuel supplied by Woolworths contained particles that caused the engine failure, and therefore, Woolworths was liable for the expenses incurred by Cohen. The court held that the evidence demonstrated a causal link between the contaminated fuel and the engine failure. Regarding the special circumstances, the court determined that the cost of the fuel analysis report was necessary and reasonable, and thus, it was appropriate to include it in the costs. Consequently, the court ordered Woolworths to pay Cohen the sum of $2,316.50 within 14 days of the date of the orders, and dismissed the remainder of the claim.
Orders
Orders of the court
1 The Respondent, Woolworths Ltd, 1 Woolworths Way Bella Vista NSW 2153 Australia, is to pay the Applicant, Peter Cohen, 10 Freya Crescent Shalvey NSW 2770 Australia, the sum of $2,316.50 within 14 days of the date of these orders.
2 The claim is otherwise dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.