| [2019] FWCA 1190 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust.) Pty Ltd T/A Coca-Cola Amatil
(AG2018/7391)
COCA-COLA AMATIL (AUST) PTY LTD HAZELMERE LOGRSFICS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 22 FEBRUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Coca-Cola Amatil (AUST) Pty Ltd - Hazelmere Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Coca-Cola Amatil (AUST) Pty Ltd - Hazelmere Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust.) Pty Ltd T/A Coca-Cola Amatil. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] United Voice being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 24.1 - Redundancy
• Clause 28 - Family Violence
However, noting clause 5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 March 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 July 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501955 PR705234>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust.) Pty Ltd T/A Coca-Cola Amatil [2019] FWCA 1190
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 1190
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine if the proposed agreement was genuinely negotiated, met the criteria for a single-enterprise agreement, and if it contained terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable. It was also necessary to consider whether the agreement contained any provisions that would unfairly discriminate against any employee or class of employees. The court assessed the negotiation process and the content of the agreement, including its compliance with relevant minimum standards set out in the Fair Work Act.
The court found that the proposed agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the employer and the union, and that it met the criteria for approval as a single-enterprise agreement. The court was satisfied that the agreement contained fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and that it did not contain any provisions that would unfairly discriminate against any employee or class of employees. The court also considered the impact of the agreement on employees' terms and conditions of employment and found that it was not contrary to the objectives of the Fair Work Act. Based on these findings, the court approved the proposed enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the court included the approval of the Coca-Cola Amatil (AUST) Pty Ltd - Hazelmere Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2018, effective from 1 April 2018, and the registration of the agreement with the Fair Work Commission. The court also ordered that the agreement be published on the Fair Work Commission's website and that the parties provide a copy of the agreement to the Fair Work Ombudsman. The respondents' objections to the proposed agreement were dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.