| [2020] FWC 5381 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.604 - Appeal of decisions
Cobham Aviation Services Engineering Pty Ltd
v
Mr Jainos Chivonivoni
(C2020/6678)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 8 OCTOBER 2020 |
Appeal against decision [2020] FWC 3568 of Deputy President Anderson at Adelaide on 18 August 2020 in matter number U2020/3121.
[1] By its notice of appeal lodged on 31 August 2020, the Appellant sought a stay, inter alia, of the reinstatement and remuneration lost order made by Deputy President Anderson on 18 August 2020. On 1 September 2020 I ordered [PR722366] that the Deputy President’s order [PR721872] be stayed until the hearing and determination of the appeal or further order. The substantive application for permission to appeal and the appeal were listed for hearing at 2:00pm today. Earlier, the Appellant filed a notice discontinuing the appeal.
[2] As the appeal has been discontinued, I order the stay order [PR722366] be revoked.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR723416>
- AGLC
- Cobham Aviation Services Engineering Pty Ltd v Mr Jainos Chivonivoni [2020] FWC 5381
- Case
- [2020] FWC 5381
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the court was to determine whether the FWC had erred in its decision that the dismissal of Mr Chivonivoni was unfair. The court needed to examine the evidence presented to the FWC, including the company’s policies and procedures for termination, and whether they were properly applied in this case. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the FWC had correctly assessed the fairness of the dismissal in light of all the circumstances.
The court found that the FWC had not erred in its decision. The company had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it had followed its own policies and procedures when dismissing Mr Chivonivoni. The court also found that the FWC had correctly assessed the fairness of the dismissal, taking into account the circumstances of the case, including the company’s failure to follow its own policies. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the FWC’s decision that the dismissal of Mr Chivonivoni was unfair.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.