Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd v Terry

Link copied
Case Copied 25 min read

LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:  Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd v Terry [2023] QLC 7
PARTIES:

Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd
ACN 113 521 734 
(applicant)

v

David Alexander Terry
(objector)

FILE NO: MRA400-22
PROCEEDING: Hearing of application for mining lease and objections
DELIVERED ON: 10 May 2023
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: 19 April 2023
HEARD AT: Mareeba
MEMBER: JR McNamara
ORDER: 1.   I recommend to the Minister for Resources, as the Minister responsible for the Mineral Resources Act 1989, that ML 100317 be granted.
CATCHWORDS:

ENERGY AND RESOURCES – MINERALS – MINING FOR MINERALS – COURTS OR TRIBUNALS EXERCISING JURISDICTION IN MINING MATTERS – QUEENSLAND – LAND COURT – where the applicant applied for mining lease to mine gold, tin and mineral sands – where the mining lease application and objection were referred to the land court pursuant to s 265 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 – where the majority of the mining application area is on the applicant’s own land – where the mining application area is on a nature refuge – where part of the mining application area is owned jointly by the applicant and objector – where the Court considered the standard criteria in s 269(4) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 – where the objections include: insufficient notice, no compensation agreement, impact of mining on a nature refuge, impact of mining on flora and fauna, impact of mining on roads, and the applicant’s lack of experience

HUMAN RIGHTS – JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – where the court considered human rights pursuant to s 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019 – where cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples considered when making recommendation on a mining application under the Mineral Resources Act 1989 – whether mining activity under mining lease would deny cultural rights held under s 28 of the Human Rights Act 2019

Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld)
Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) ss 28, 58
Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld) ss 72, 252, 265, 269
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

Cement Australia Exploration Pty Ltd & Anor v East end Mine Action Group & Anor (No 4) [2021] QLC 22, cited
Fisher on behalf of the Ewamian People #2 v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 1249, cited
Sunland Cattle Co Pty Ltd v Kingham [2021] QSC 287, cited
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No 6) [2022] QLC 21, cited

APPEARANCES: S Terry for the applicant

Background

[1]The applicant, Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd, lodged Mining Lease Application 100317 (ML 100317) on 12 July 2022.  Simon Terry is the sole Director and Secretary of Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd. 

[2]The applicant’s intention is to mine for gold, tin and mineral sands within the bed and banks of Agate Creek from its junction with the Robertson River in a northerly direction. The general location is 30km south-west of Forsayth in North Queensland. The proposed mining lease area is 118.8ha. 

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd v Terry and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] QLC 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Cobbold Gorge Tours Pty Ltd v Terry, the applicant, Cobbold Gorge Tours, applied for a mining lease to mine gold, tin, and mineral sands in Queensland. The application and objection were referred to the Land Court under section 265 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989. The dispute involved objections raised by Terry regarding the impact of the mining on a nature refuge, flora and fauna, roads, lack of compensation agreement, insufficient notice, and the applicant’s lack of experience. Additionally, the objections raised concerns about the cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples under section 28 of the Human Rights Act 2019.

The court was required to determine whether the mining activity would deny the cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, as well as consider the standard criteria in section 269(4) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989. The court considered the objections raised by Terry and whether they warranted the refusal of the mining lease. The court also had to assess whether the mining activity would cause significant harm to the environment, including the impact on a nature refuge and the surrounding flora and fauna.

After considering all the evidence and objections, the court recommended to the Minister for Resources that the mining lease ML 100317 be granted. The court found that the objections raised by Terry were not sufficient to warrant the refusal of the mining lease. The court considered the cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples under section 28 of the Human Rights Act 2019 and determined that the mining activity would not deny those rights. The court also found that the mining activity would not cause significant harm to the environment, including the impact on a nature refuge and the surrounding flora and fauna.

The final orders of the court were to recommend to the Minister for Resources that the mining lease ML 100317 be granted. The court found that the objections raised by Terry were not sufficient to warrant the refusal of the mining lease, and that the mining activity would not deny the cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples or cause significant harm to the environment.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. I recommend to the Minister for Resources, as the Minister responsible for the Mineral Resources Act 1989, that ML 100317 be granted.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.