Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited T/A CBH Group

Case [2021] FWCA 1506


[2021] FWCA 1506
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited T/A CBH Group
(AG2021/4007)

CBH GERALDTON PLANT OPERATORS UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2021

Grain handling industry

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 19 MARCH 2021

Application for approval of the CBH Geraldton Plant Operators Union Collective Agreement 2021.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CBH Geraldton Plant Operators Union Collective Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited T/A CBH Group. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 March 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE510820  PR727932>

Details
AGLC
Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited T/A CBH Group [2021] FWCA 1506
Case
[2021] FWCA 1506
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by the CBH Geraldton Plant Operators Union for approval of their collective agreement for the year 2021. The parties before the court were the CBH Geraldton Plant Operators Union and the Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited, trading as CBH Group. The dispute centred around the approval of the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed collective agreement. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which is responsible for handling employment-related disputes and overseeing the enforcement of workplace laws in Australia.

The central legal issue the court needed to address was whether the terms of the proposed collective agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a "registered agreement" under the Act. This included assessing whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, and whether it was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the union. Additionally, the court had to consider if the agreement adhered to the provisions regarding minimum entitlements and dispute resolution processes.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission thoroughly examined the terms of the proposed agreement. The court found that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, and it was satisfied that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The court also determined that the agreement did not contravene any minimum entitlements set out in the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the dispute resolution mechanisms within the agreement were deemed to be adequate. Based on these findings, the court approved the collective agreement as compliant with the necessary legal standards.

The final order of the Fair Work Commission was that the CBH Geraldton Plant Operators Union Collective Agreement 2021 be approved and registered. This decision ensured that the terms and conditions of employment for the union members would be legally binding and enforceable under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.