CM

Link copied
Case Copied 25 min read
CITATION: CM [2011] QCAT 693
PARTIES: CM
APPLICATION NUMBER: GAA7239-11 / GAA7240-11
MATTER TYPE: Guardianship and administration matters for adults
HEARING DATE: 21 December 2011
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Pam Goodman, Member
DELIVERED ON: 21 December 2011
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: The Tribunal advises the Administrator that funds should not be released to CM for the purpose of engaging legal representation for CM to investigate allegations raised against The Public Trustee of Queensland or the Adult Guardian while appointed as substituted decision makers for CM.
CATCHWORDS:

ADMINISTRATION – where advice and recommendations sought by administrator for adult with impaired capacity – where allegations made that appointed decision makers had failed to discharge their duties appropriately – where Administrator was asked to release funds so legal advice could be sought as to possible legal action against appointed decision makers – where determination already made that appointed decision makers had acted appropriately

Guardianship and Administration Act 2000, s 138

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act).

REASONS FOR DECISION

THE APPLICATION

[1]    On 9 September 2011 the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) received an application from The Public Trustee of Queensland seeking advice and recommendations in relation to this matter.

[2]    The Public Trustee of Queensland had been appointed as administrator for Mr CM over various periods but most recently on 18 June 2010.  That appointment remains in place.  Reasons for that decision were provided in writing by QCAT on 9 July 2010.[1]

[1]        CDM [2010] QCAT 317.

[3]    The Public Trustee of Queensland now seeks a determination from QCAT as to whether some of CM’s funds should be released in order that a solicitor might be engaged to advise CM whether he has a right of action against the Public Trustee of Queensland and / or the Adult Guardian, who was previously appointed to act as CM’s guardian. 

THE RELEVANT LAW

[4]    I have had regard to the provisions of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (the QCAT Act), and the Guardianship and Administration Act2000 (the GAA Act).

[5]    The GAA Act establishes a scheme whereby substituted decision makers may be appointed by this Tribunal (and previously by the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal) in circumstances set out in s 12 of that Act.  Section 12 provides that the Tribunal may appoint a guardian or an administrator if it is satisfied that:

(a)the adult has impaired capacity for the matter; and

(b)there is a need for a decision in relation to the matter or the adult is likely to do something in relation to the matter that involves, or is likely to involve, unreasonable risk to the adult’s health, welfare or property; and

(c)without an appointment—

(i)    the adult’s needs will not be adequately met; or

(ii)  the adult’s interests will not be adequately protected.

[6]    The Act allows QCAT, in particular…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read CM and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] QCAT 693
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved CM, an individual with impaired capacity, and the Administrator, who was responsible for administering CM's affairs. The dispute centred around allegations that the appointed decision makers had not discharged their duties correctly. CM sought advice and recommendations from the Administrator, who was then asked to release funds for CM to obtain legal representation to investigate these allegations. However, a previous determination had already concluded that the appointed decision makers had acted appropriately.

The court was required to determine whether the Administrator should release funds to CM for the purpose of obtaining legal advice and potentially taking legal action against the appointed decision makers. The legal issues included whether the Administrator was obligated to release funds for this purpose, given that a previous determination had already found the appointed decision makers to have acted appropriately, and whether such action would be in CM's best interests.

In reaching its decision, the court considered the previous determination that the appointed decision makers had acted appropriately, as well as the potential implications of releasing funds for legal action against them. The court concluded that releasing funds for this purpose would not be in CM's best interests, given that the appointed decision makers had already been found to have acted appropriately. The court further found that it was not in the interests of justice to allow CM to pursue legal action against the appointed decision makers when a previous determination had already concluded that they had acted appropriately.

The Tribunal advised the Administrator that funds should not be released to CM for the purpose of engaging legal representation for CM to investigate allegations raised against The Public Trustee of Queensland or the Adult Guardian while appointed as substituted decision makers for CM. This decision was made in light of the previous determination that the appointed decision makers had acted appropriately and in consideration of CM's best interests.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Tribunal advises the Administrator that funds should not be released to CM for the purpose of engaging legal representation for CM to investigate allegations raised against The Public Trustee of Queensland or the Adult Guardian while appointed as substituted decision makers for CM.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.