Clyne v State Rail Authority of New South Wales

Case [2005] NSWDDT 4


Dust Diseases Tribunal


of New South Wales


CITATION:

Clyne v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWDDT 4

PARTIES:

John William Clyne
State Rail Authority of New South Wales

MATTER NUMBER(S):

240 of 2004

JUDGMENT OF:

Curtis J at 1

:-

DATES OF HEARING: 16/02/05
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE:

02/16/2005

LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

FOR PLAINTIFF: Ms H Wall instructed by Low Doherty and Stratford.
FOR DEFENDANT: Mr A Parker instructed by Moroney Betts



JUDGMENT:


1. John William Clyne sues the State Rail Authority for damages as a result of his contracting the disease of mesothelioma from asbestos inhalation during the course of his employment with the defendant between 1962 and 1975. The defendant has not raised liability as an issue and the task before me is an assessment of damages.

2. Mr Clyne was born in Katoomba on 2 January 1947 and is now 57 years of age. Having retired from the service of the defendant in 1990, he has held a variety of positions as a driver and storeman. He was in good health until October 2003 when he commenced to feel shortness of breath. He was subsequently admitted to Blacktown Hospital for pleural aspirations and has had a course of radiotherapy and also chemotherapy. His prognosis is hopeless and understandably he has suffered greatly from depression and anxiety.

3. He has a daughter and two grandchildren and expresses his profound disappointment that he will not have the advantage of seeing them grow. He suffers from pain which increases on breathing. He sleeps little. It is probable that Mr Clyne will die on or about, for the purpose of calculation, 1 September 2005.

4. I set general damages in the sum of $190,000.

5. I allow interest on $150,000 for 18 months at the rate of 2 per cent, which is $4500.

6. I allow $25,000 in respect of loss of expectation of life.

7. For past Griffiths v Kerkemeyer, I allow eight hours per week at $20 which amounts to date to $8160. Future Griffiths v Kerkemeyer is agreed in the sum of $20,000.

8. Mrs Donna Clyne, the plaintiff's wife, is not in good health. She suffers from a condition of mild lupus, which in the opinion of Dr David Macauley, is unlikely to deteriorate.

9. Although so suffering, Mrs Clyne is able to manage her normal household chores, although her husband normally undertakes the heavier duties, particularly in the garden. I accept that Mrs Clyne required the services of her husband in respect of the heavier duties. Also, because of her condition of agoraphobia, company when she is distressed when out of doors.

10. It is probable that Mr Clyne would not be performing the heavier work in the garden at the age of 77 and I allow 20 years of one and a half hours per week at $20, which amounts to $23,625.

11. Past economic loss is agreed at $26,010. Future economic loss until the age of retirement is agreed at $85,000. In addition, I allow $20,000 as a buffer against the contingency that Mr Clyne would perform some work after the age of 65.

12. I allow home modifications in the sum of $1553.

13. Past out of pockets are agreed in the sum of $4200. Future out of pockets are agreed in the sum of $5000.

14. Judgment for the plaintiff for $413,048.

15. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs.


Ms H Wall instructed by Low Doherty and Stratford appeared for the plaintiff


Mr A Parker instructed by Moroney Betts appeared for the defendant

Details
AGLC
Clyne v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWDDT 4
Case
[2005] NSWDDT 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Clyne v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, John William Clyne, a former employee of the State Rail Authority, sought damages for mesothelioma contracted due to asbestos inhalation during his employment with the defendant from 1962 to 1975. The defendant did not contest liability, and the tribunal was tasked with assessing the appropriate damages. Clyne, who was born in 1947 and now aged 57, suffered from severe health issues following his diagnosis in 2003, including shortness of breath, requiring pleural aspirations, and undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. His prognosis is hopeless, and he has experienced considerable emotional distress and physical pain. The tribunal awarded Clyne damages, including general damages of $190,000, interest on $150,000, loss of expectation of life, and past and future economic losses.

The legal issues before the tribunal were the calculation of general damages, interest, loss of expectation of life, past and future economic loss, and non-economic loss, including home modifications and out-of-pocket expenses. The tribunal assessed Clyne's suffering, prognosis, and impact on his life, including his inability to perform household chores and the loss of companionship to his wife, who suffers from mild lupus and agoraphobia. The tribunal also considered the impact on Clyne's wife, who required assistance with heavier household tasks and companionship, and awarded damages for this loss.

Curtis J calculated the damages based on the evidence and legal principles. General damages were awarded to compensate for Clyne's pain, suffering, and loss of life expectancy. Interest was applied to part of the general damages, and additional damages were awarded for loss of expectation of life. Economic loss was assessed based on past and future earnings, and non-economic loss included home modifications and out-of-pocket expenses. The tribunal also considered the impact on Clyne's wife, awarding damages for loss of services and companionship. The total award was $413,048, and the defendant was ordered to pay Clyne's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.