Clothing and Allied Trades Union v Snugglerite Industries Pty Ltd
Case
•
[1990] FCA 493
•07 SEPTEMBER 1990
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia v Snugglerite Industries Pty Ltd [1990] FCA 493 (34 IR 124)
[1990] FCA 493
07 SEPTEMBER 1990
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter between the Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia and Snugglerite Industries Pty Ltd was heard in the Industrial Court. The union alleged that Snugglerite Industries had breached certain terms of the Clothing Trades Award, 1982 by not correctly engaging outworkers. The union claimed that the company had failed to adhere to the award's conditions when employing outworkers, and sought penalties for these alleged breaches.
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the outworkers employed by Snugglerite Industries were indeed engaged to perform work in their own establishments, rather than at Snugglerite's premises. Additionally, the court had to decide whether the requirement that the employer apply to outworkers the terms and conditions of employment provided by the award obligated the employer to grant preference in the engagement of outworkers. The court also needed to ascertain whether the alleged breaches of the award arose from a course of conduct by the respondent.
The court found that the outworkers were engaged to perform work in their own establishments and that Snugglerite Industries had not correctly applied the award's terms and conditions of employment to the outworkers. Consequently, the court held that the breaches of the award had indeed arisen from a course of conduct by the respondent. The court imposed a penalty of $500 upon Snugglerite Industries in respect of the 12 breaches of clause 40 of the Clothing Trades Award, 1982, with the penalty to be paid to the Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia. The application for the imposition of further penalties was dismissed.
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the outworkers employed by Snugglerite Industries were indeed engaged to perform work in their own establishments, rather than at Snugglerite's premises. Additionally, the court had to decide whether the requirement that the employer apply to outworkers the terms and conditions of employment provided by the award obligated the employer to grant preference in the engagement of outworkers. The court also needed to ascertain whether the alleged breaches of the award arose from a course of conduct by the respondent.
The court found that the outworkers were engaged to perform work in their own establishments and that Snugglerite Industries had not correctly applied the award's terms and conditions of employment to the outworkers. Consequently, the court held that the breaches of the award had indeed arisen from a course of conduct by the respondent. The court imposed a penalty of $500 upon Snugglerite Industries in respect of the 12 breaches of clause 40 of the Clothing Trades Award, 1982, with the penalty to be paid to the Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia. The application for the imposition of further penalties was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Industrial Law
-
Penalties
-
Arbitration
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Forster Tuncurry Golf Club Ltd t/as Forster Tuncurry Golf Club v Martin Crew [2016] FWC 170
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Fair Work Ombudsman v South Jin Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2016] FCA 832
Fair Work Ombudsman v South Jin Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2016] FCA 832
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
James Turner Roofing Pty Ltd v Peters
[2003] WASCA 28
James Turner Roofing Pty Ltd v Peters
[2003] WASCA 28
James Turner Roofing Pty Ltd v Peters
[2003] WASCA 28