Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Australian Clinical Laboratories

Case [2021] FWCA 2575


[2021] FWCA 2575
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Australian Clinical Laboratories
(AG2021/4473)

AUSTRALIAN CLINICAL LABS (VICTORIA) AND HEALTH SERVICES UNION MEDICAL SCIENTISTS AND TECHNICIANS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021 -2025

Health and welfare services

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 7 MAY 2021

Application for approval of the Australian Clinical Labs (Victoria) and Health Services Union Medical Scientists and Technicians Enterprise Agreement 2021 -2025.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Clinical Labs (Victoria) and Health Services Union Medical Scientists and Technicians Enterprise Agreement 2021 -2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Australian Clinical Laboratories. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The voting process for the Agreement commenced on 16 March 2021, therefore the 7-day access period started on the first full day after 8 March 2021. Employees were provided with the voting information on 9 March 2021. As such, the Employer did not provide employees with the voting information by the start of the access period as required under s.180(3). The Employer provided submissions in relation to this error. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a). Furthermore, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

[5] The Health Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 58.5(b), 58.7(c) and 58.12 – Personal/Carer’s Leave

  Clause 62.1(f) and 62.10 – Long Service Leave

  Clause 63.2(b)(i), 63.3(f)(i), 63.8(a) and 63.8(b) – Parental Leave

  Clause 69.5(a)(i) – Public Holidays.

However, noting clause 4.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 May 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 March 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE511362  PR729617>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Australian Clinical Laboratories [2021] FWCA 2575
Case
[2021] FWCA 2575
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Clinical Laboratories Pty Ltd, trading as Australian Clinical Laboratories, applied for the approval of the Australian Clinical Labs (Victoria) and Health Services Union Medical Scientists and Technicians Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025. The agreement was contested by the Health Services Union. The dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment for medical scientists and technicians within the laboratories, including wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections relating to enterprise agreements, procedural fairness, and the "better off overall test" (BOOT). The Commission had to ensure that the agreement was made in good faith, was not misleading or deceptive, and that it provided employees with a minimum rate of pay and conditions that were no less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award or safety net. Additionally, the agreement had to pass the better off overall test, ensuring that the overall benefits to employees outweighed any detriments.

In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It assessed whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, taking into account the needs of both employers and employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement met all the legal requirements for approval. It found that the agreement was made in good faith and did not mislead or deceive employees. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement provided employees with a minimum rate of pay and conditions that were at least as favourable as those in the relevant award, and that it passed the better off overall test.

Accordingly, the Fair Work Commission approved the Australian Clinical Labs (Victoria) and Health Services Union Medical Scientists and Technicians Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025. The approved agreement will now serve as the basis for the terms and conditions of employment for medical scientists and technicians within the laboratories for the specified period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.