Clever Kids Creative Centres v Inner West Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1238


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Clever Kids Creative Centres v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1238
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 10 June 2016
Date of orders: 10 June 2016
Decision date: 10 June 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Fakes C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; alterations and additions and change of use to a child care centre; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Clever Kids Creative Centres (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Applicant: Ms N Hinks (Solicitor)
Respondent: Mr S Patterson

  Solicitors:
Applicant: Hones Lawyers
Respondent: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers
File Number(s):151759 of 2016 (Formerly 2015/10999)
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Consent is granted to DA 10.2015.106.1 for the change of use and alterations and additions to create a long day care centre at 215-217 Parramatta Road, Haberfield subject to the conditions in Annexure “A”.

_____________________________

Judy Fakes

Commissioner of the Court

151759.16 Annexure A conditions (104 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Clever Kids Creative Centres v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1238
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1238
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Clever Kids Creative Centres v Inner West Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The applicant, Clever Kids Creative Centres, sought a review of a decision made by the respondent, Inner West Council, to deny a development application for a franchise of a children's creative learning centre. The applicant argued that the decision was unreasonable, and that the council's consideration of a statutory planning consideration related to the character of the local area was flawed.

The legal issues before the court involved the scope and application of statutory planning considerations under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, specifically focusing on whether the council had correctly considered the character of the local area. The court was asked to determine whether the council had acted unreasonably in its assessment of the proposed development and whether there were errors in the application of the statutory considerations.

The court examined the council's decision-making process and the evidence presented before it. It found that the council had appropriately considered the statutory planning considerations and had not acted unreasonably in denying the development application. The court upheld the council's decision, emphasising that the council had a broad discretion in assessing developments against planning considerations and that the applicant had not demonstrated that the council's decision was flawed. The court dismissed the application and affirmed the council's decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.