Clancy v Nominal Defendant (Qld)

Case •

[1996] HCATrans 2

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Brisbane   No B21 of 1995

B e t w e e n -

TRACEY LLOYD CLANCY

Applicant

and

NOMINAL DEFENDANT (QUEENSLAND)

Respondent

Grounds for decision

TOOHEY J
McHUGH J
KIRBY J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 7 MARCH 1996, AT 10.19 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

TOOHEY J:   This application for special leave to appeal was considered by Justices McHugh, Kirby and myself.  We would refuse the application.  I publish the grounds for our decision.

The order of the Court is that the application for special leave to appeal is refused with costs.

AT 10.19 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Key Legal Topics

Areas of Law

  • Negligence & Tort

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Damages

  • Causation

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Limitation Periods

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0