City & Suburban Pty Ltd v Smith

Link copied
Case Copied 35 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CORPORATIONS LAW - liquidation - application by creditors to remove liquidator - prima facie evidence of breach of duty by liquidator - Whether sufficient cause to remove liquidator - tests of when Court may be satisfied of sufficient cause – whether liquidator should be afforded opportunity to resign - liquidator’s application for remuneration - reduction of remuneration in respect of liquidator’s failure to investigate properly certain matters.

Corporations Law ss 503, 548

Re Adam Eyton Ltd; Ex parte Charlesworth (1887) 36 Ch D 299 applied
Re The Mutual Live Stock Financial and Agency Company Limited (1886) 12 VLR 777 cited
Re George A. Bond and Company Ltd (1932) 32 SR NSW 301 applied
Re Giant Resources Limited [1991] 1 Qd R 107 cited
Network Exchange Pty Ltd v MIG International Communications Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 544 cited
Re Biposo Pty Ltd (1995) 17 ACSR 730 considered
Dallinger v Halcha Holdings Pty Ltd (1995) 134 ALR 178 cited
Re National Safety Council of Australia, Victorian Division [1990] VR 29 applied
Adsett v Berlouis (1992) 37 FCR 201 cited
Tracker Software v Smith (1997) 24 ACSR 644 cited

Law of Company Liquidation (B H McPherson, 3rd ed by J O’Donovan, 1987)

CITY & SUBURBAN PTY LTD & OTHERS V MICHAEL JOHN MORRIS SMITH LIQUIDATOR OF CONPAC (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) & ANOTHER

NG 3027 1998
NG 3065 of 1998

MERKEL J
9 JULY 1998
CANBERRA (HEARD IN SYDNEY)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SYDNEY DISTRICT REGISTRY

NG 3027 OF 1998
NG 3065 OF 1998

BETWEEN:

CITY & SUBURBAN PTY LTD AND OTHERS
APPLICANTS

AND:

MICHAEL JOHN MORRIS SMITH LIQUIDATOR OF CONPAC (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS

AND IN THE MATTER OF:

CONPAC (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
ACN 003 483 234 AND THE CORPORATIONS LAW

JUDGE:

MERKEL J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 JULY 1998

WHERE MADE:

CANBERRA (HEARD IN SYDNEY)

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. Michael John Morris Smith be removed as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation).

  1. Richard Campbell Brien be appointed as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation).

  1. A declaration be made that Michael John Morris Smith is entitled to remuneration of $92,651.36 for acting as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation) for the period from 22 August 1997 to 30 November 1997.

  1. The liquidator may file submissions as to costs on or before Thursday, 16 July 1998.

  1. The applicants may file submissions as to costs on or before Thursday, 23 July 1998.

Note:              Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SYDNEY  DISTRICT REGISTRY

NG 3027 OF 1998
NG 3065 OF 1998

BETWEEN:

CITY & SUBURBAN PTY LTD AND OTHERS
APPLICANTS

AND:

MICHAEL JOHN MORRIS SMITH, LIQUIDATOR OF CONPAC (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS

AND IN THE MATTER OF:

CONPAC (AUST) PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
ACN 003 483 234 AND THE CORPORATIONS LAW

JUDGE:

MERKEL J

DATE:

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read City & Suburban Pty Ltd v Smith and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1998] FCA 822
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In City & Suburban Pty Ltd v Smith, the dispute involved the removal of Michael John Morris Smith from his position as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited, which was in liquidation, and his replacement with Richard Campbell Brien. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue before the court was whether there were valid grounds for the removal of Smith as liquidator, considering that he had been appointed by the creditors of the company and whether the proposed replacement, Brien, was suitable to assume the role. Additionally, the court had to determine whether Smith was entitled to remuneration for his services rendered during the period he acted as liquidator.

The court found that there were valid grounds to remove Smith due to concerns regarding his competence and the manner in which he was conducting the liquidation. The evidence presented indicated that Smith had failed to act in a manner that was in the best interest of the creditors and had not been fulfilling his duties as liquidator adequately. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of appointing Brien as the new liquidator. The court also determined that Smith was entitled to remuneration for the period during which he acted as liquidator, as he had performed certain duties and expended effort in that role. The court set the remuneration amount at $92,651.36. Furthermore, the court provided instructions for the filing of submissions regarding costs by both parties.

The court's final orders included the removal of Smith as liquidator and the appointment of Brien in his place, along with the declaration of Smith's entitlement to remuneration. The court also specified the deadlines for both parties to file their submissions on costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Michael John Morris Smith be removed as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation).

2.

Richard Campbell Brien be appointed as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation).

3.

A declaration be made that Michael John Morris Smith is entitled to remuneration of $92,651.36 for acting as liquidator of Conpac (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation) for the period from 22 August 1997 to 30 November 1997.

4.

The liquidator may file submissions as to costs on or before Thursday, 16 July 1998.

5.

The applicants may file submissions as to costs on or before Thursday, 23 July 1998.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.