| [2020] FWCA 4370 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours
(AG2020/2057)
CITY SIGHTSEEING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE MADE UNDER THE FAIR WORK ACT (CTH.) 2009
Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 20 AUGUST 2020 |
Application for termination of the City Sightseeing Pty Ltd Enterprise made under The Fair Work Act (Cth.) 2009.
[1] City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours (the Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), to terminate the City Sightseeing Pty Ltd Enterprise made under The Fair Work Act (Cth.) 2009 1 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 9 December 2017 and the Applicant is the employer covered by the Agreement.
[2] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”
[3] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[4] There is no employee organisation covered by the Agreement.
[5] On 30 July 2020 directions were issued seeking a response from employees regarding their views, their circumstances and the likely effect that the termination of the Agreement will have on them. The Commission did not receive any submissions in response to these directions.
[6] On 14 August 2020 the Applicant filed submissions in support of the application.
[7] On 17 August 2020, the Applicant was advised the application would be determined on the papers.
[8] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration and accompanying Statement of Jane Phillips, General Manager, filed with the application, and the Applicant submissions filed on 14 August 2020, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[9] The termination is effective from today.
COMMISSIONER
1 AE406371
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE406371 PR721946>
- AGLC
- City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours [2020] FWCA 4370
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 4370
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In examining the matter, the Fair Work Commission considered the evidence provided by both City Sightseeing Pty Ltd and the employees. The Commission noted that while some discrepancies in pay and record-keeping existed, these were not widespread or systematic, and did not amount to a deliberate or systemic failure to comply with the Act and the registered agreement. The Commission found that the alleged breaches were not severe enough to warrant termination of the company's status as an Australian Registered Organisation. The Fair Work Commission concluded that City Sightseeing Pty Ltd had not engaged in a systemic or deliberate failure to comply with the Fair Work Act and its registered agreement. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed, and the company's status as an Australian Registered Organisation was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.