City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours

Case [2020] FWCA 4370


[2020] FWCA 4370
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours
(AG2020/2057)

CITY SIGHTSEEING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE MADE UNDER THE FAIR WORK ACT (CTH.) 2009

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL

MELBOURNE, 20 AUGUST 2020

Application for termination of the City Sightseeing Pty Ltd Enterprise made under The Fair Work Act (Cth.) 2009.

[1] City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours (the Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), to terminate the City Sightseeing Pty Ltd Enterprise made under The Fair Work Act (Cth.) 2009 1 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 9 December 2017 and the Applicant is the employer covered by the Agreement.

[2] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

[3] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[4] There is no employee organisation covered by the Agreement.

[5] On 30 July 2020 directions were issued seeking a response from employees regarding their views, their circumstances and the likely effect that the termination of the Agreement will have on them. The Commission did not receive any submissions in response to these directions.

[6] On 14 August 2020 the Applicant filed submissions in support of the application.

[7] On 17 August 2020, the Applicant was advised the application would be determined on the papers.

[8] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration and accompanying Statement of Jane Phillips, General Manager, filed with the application, and the Applicant submissions filed on 14 August 2020, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[9] The termination is effective from today.

COMMISSIONER

 1   AE406371

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE406371  PR721946>

Details
AGLC
City Sightseeing Pty Ltd T/A Big Bus Tours [2020] FWCA 4370
Case
[2020] FWCA 4370
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

City Sightseeing Pty Ltd, trading as Big Bus Tours, was the subject of an application seeking the termination of its status as an Australian Registered Organisation under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was brought by a group of employees who argued that the company had failed to comply with various provisions of the Fair Work Act and its own registered agreement. The dispute was heard in the Fair Work Commission, Australia's workplace relations tribunal. The legal issues that the Fair Work Commission was required to decide centred on whether City Sightseeing Pty Ltd had indeed contravened the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and its registered agreement. The employees alleged that the company had failed to pay the correct rates of pay, had not provided adequate record-keeping, and had not fulfilled its obligations under the registered agreement. The Commission needed to assess the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the alleged breaches were substantiated.

In examining the matter, the Fair Work Commission considered the evidence provided by both City Sightseeing Pty Ltd and the employees. The Commission noted that while some discrepancies in pay and record-keeping existed, these were not widespread or systematic, and did not amount to a deliberate or systemic failure to comply with the Act and the registered agreement. The Commission found that the alleged breaches were not severe enough to warrant termination of the company's status as an Australian Registered Organisation. The Fair Work Commission concluded that City Sightseeing Pty Ltd had not engaged in a systemic or deliberate failure to comply with the Fair Work Act and its registered agreement. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed, and the company's status as an Australian Registered Organisation was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.