CIJ15 v Minister for Immigration
[2016] FCCA 3374
•22 December 2016
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CIJ15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2016] FCCA 3374 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration & Refugee Division) – Protection (Class XA) visa – no appearance – application of r.13.03C(1)(c) – application dismissed. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, rr.13.03C(1)(c), 16.05(2)(a) |
| Applicant: | CIJ15 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 3021 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 22 December 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 December 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 22 December 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Mr T Galvin Minter Ellison Lawyers |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the costs of the First Respondent fixed in the amount of $1,500.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 3021 of 2015
| CIJ15 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Background
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Act”) in respect of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) made on 20 October 2015 affirming a decision of the delegate not to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa.
The applicant commenced proceedings in this Court on 6 November 2015. The applicant failed to appear on the return date. An order was made by a Registrar of the Court on 10 December 2015 dismissing the proceedings for want of appearance under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) (“the Rules”).
On 20 December 2016, the applicant filed an application in a case supported by an affidavit seeking to set aside the orders made on 10 December 2015. In the application in a case, there is a handwritten email address.
Before this Court
The matter was the subject of an order dated 20 December 2016 listing the matter for hearing at 10:15am today. That order was forwarded to the email address identified on the application in a case. No appearance has been made by the applicant. The matter has been called twice outside the Court and it is now 10:30 am. The Court has made four attempts to contact the applicant on the telephone number identified on the application in a case. All four attempts have been unsuccessful. The email that was sent to the email address on the application in a case was not the subject of any bounce-back and on the material before the Court, I am satisfied that the applicant was notified of the hearing date.
The first respondent has moved under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Rules for the application to be dismissed. I note that if the applicant has a satisfactory explanation for the failure to appear at today’s hearing, it would still be open to the applicant to apply under r.16.05(2)(a) of the Rules if a satisfactory explanation can be provided, subject to the Court being satisfied that there is utility in setting aside the order by reason of the existence of a sufficiently arguable case.
The Court is satisfied that the order listing the matter for hearing was sent to the correct email address identified on the application. The Court is satisfied that appropriate steps have been taken to try and contact the applicant by telephone. In the circumstances of the present case, the Court concludes that the applicant was aware of the hearing date and has failed to appear. I am satisfied that this is an appropriate case in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Rules.
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of Rules.
I certify that the preceding seven (7) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 25 January 2017
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3