CHYB & DAMIANI (Civil Disputes)

Link copied
Case Copied 29 min read

ACT CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CHYB v DAMIANI (Civil Disputes) [2010] ACAT 13

XD 732 of 2009

Catchwords:          CIVIL DISPUTES – nuisance application

Legislation:ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 (ACT)

Case Law:Pittar v Alverez (1916) 16 SR (NSW) 618

Munro v Southern Dairies Ltd (1955) VLR  332

Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds v Taylor (1937) HCA 45

Bathurst City Council v Saban (1985) 2 NSWLR

Raciti v Hughes (1995) 7 BPR 14,837

Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd (1981) AC 1001

Alfreds case (1610) 77 ER 816

Gartner v Kidman (1962) 108 CLR 12

Tribunal:Mr P Thompson  Member

Date of Orders:  1 September 2009

Date of Reasons for Decision:   23 March 2010

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY            )

CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL       )          XD 732 of 2009

BETWEEN:  SYLWESTER CHYB

Applicant

AND:             
  MAURIZIO DAMIANI

Respondent

Tribunal:Mr P Thompson, Member

Date:  1 September 2009

ORDER

1.      See undertakings on file.

2.      No order made except to adjourn these proceedings.

3.      Liberty to restore to the list on 7 days notice by either party.

4.      Subpoenaed documents can be copied by either party.

………..……………………………..
Mr P Thompson
Member

REASONS FOR DECISION

1.On 16 July 2009, Dr Sylwester Chyb filed a Nuisance Application in the Tribunal in which he named his neighbour, Mr. Maurizio Damiani as the respondent.

2.In his application, Dr Chyb, who resides at 75 La Perouse Street, Griffith, alleged that Mr. Damiani, who then resided at 73 La Perouse Street, Griffith, had, shortly after the Chybs moved into their new home, “embarked on an unprovoked and malicious campaign of harassment against my family.”

3.According to Dr Chyb’s application, there were four issues that had caused, or in some cases, continued to cause nuisance to him and his family. Those issues were stated to be:

1.       noise from the pool equipment and reverse cycle unit located opposite our living spaces,

2.       external lights on the SE and NE walls of the Damiani’s house which face our property,

3.       Illegal development – cubbyhouse on a raised platform surrounded by raised decking,

4.       Mr. Damiani taking photographs of us from cubbyhouse and and [sic] his house.

4.The details of each of the four issues forming the basis of the Nuisance Application are fully set out in the application, and will be dealt with later.

5.Dr Chyb went on to state that as a result of the above actions of Mr. Damiani:

...we have suffered significant loss of quality of life and needed to involve government agencies to help us resolve the situation. When we thought the noise issue was addressed, Mr. Damiani switched to harassing us with external lights. When this was resolved by the fine, he went back to subjecting us to noise. Both my wife and myself sought professional medical advice to help us deal with the stress caused by behaviour of Mr. Damiani.

6.The remedies sought by Dr Chyb as set out in his application were:

1.       Relocate the pool equipment and reverse cycle…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read CHYB & DAMIANI (Civil Disputes) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] ACAT 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a dispute between neighbours, Dr Sylwester Chyb and Mr Maurizio Damiani. Dr Chyb filed a Nuisance Application against Mr Damiani, alleging that he had embarked on a campaign of harassment against his family, causing significant loss of quality of life. The issues raised in the application were noise from the pool equipment and reverse cycle unit, external lights on the Damiani's house, an allegedly illegal cubbyhouse, and photographs taken by Mr Damiani. Dr Chyb sought various remedies and monetary damages.

The legal issues the court was required to decide were whether the actions of Mr Damiani constituted a nuisance and if so, what remedies should be granted. The court had to consider the evidence presented by both parties, including the efforts made by Mr Damiani to address the concerns raised by Dr Chyb.

The court found that while Mr Damiani's actions may have caused some disturbance to Dr Chyb and his family, they were not malicious or deliberate. The court accepted that Mr Damiani had taken reasonable steps to address the issues raised by Dr Chyb, including modifying the external lights and enclosing the pool equipment. The court also found that there was insufficient evidence to support Dr Chyb's claim for damages.

The final orders made by the court were that Mr Damiani would give undertakings to turn off the pool pump outside certain hours, soundproof the sides of the property, and not use the side lights of the property. The matter was adjourned generally, and the parties were advised that they could return to the Tribunal if there was a proven breach of the undertakings. The court declined to award damages to Dr Chyb due to insufficient evidence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.