Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2010] AATA 1042
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2009/4813
VETERANS’ APPEALS DIVISION ) Re STANLEY CHURCH Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member Bernard J McCabe Date 22 December 2010
Place Brisbane (heard in Townsville)
Decision The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and decides in substitution that the applicant has experienced a clinical worsening of his PTSD condition as a consequence of operational service. His major depression and alcohol abuse conditions are also linked to his service as a result. The matter should be remitted to the Commission for assessment with a date of effect of 14 October 2008. ...................[Sgd]...........................
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ COMPENSATION – post-traumatic stress disorder – depressive disorder – alcohol abuse disorder – whether applicant experienced clinical worsening as a result of operational service – claims of stressful events – historical discrepancies – decision set aside.
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s 120
Repatriation Commission v Milenz (2006) 93 ALD 107
REASONS FOR DECISION
22 December 2010 Senior Member Bernard J McCabe 1. Stanley Church joined the Navy in 1963 when he was 15 years of age. He served aboard HMAS Melbourne when that ship collided with HMAS Voyager in 1964. He was still on the Melbourne when it collided with USS Frank E Evans in 1969. He developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of the Voyager incident in particular. He subsequently developed major depressive disorder and alcohol abuse disorder.
2. Mr Church is not eligible for a pension as a result of the Voyager and Evans incidents because they did not occur while he was on operational service. But Mr Church now points to three other incidents that he claims occurred while he was on operational service after the collisions. He said those events caused a clinical worsening of his existing PTSD condition. He has sought a pension under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) (“the Act”) on that basis.
The background facts
3. Mr Church joined the Navy as a young man. He worked as a stoker. Most of his time was spent in the boiler room of the various ships on which he served. He was on the Melbourne the night that it collided with the Voyager. He took an active role in assisting the injured sailors who had been taken from the sea after the Voyager sank. The events he described were clearly distressing. He gave evidence to the effect that he experienced sleeplessness, bad dreams and intrusive recollections for a period following the incident. He also began to drink. But he said he began to feel better after a while. He said his experience of the subsequent collision with the Frank E Evans was less distressing, if only because he was at work in the boiler room when the collision occurred and he did not have the opportunity to go on deck until many hours after the incident. He agreed that memories of the Voyager
Continue reading Church and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Church and Repatriation Commission [2010] AATA 1042
- Case
- [2010] AATA 1042
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal considered the evidence presented by Mr. Church, including his service history, the onset and progression of his conditions, and the impact of his service on his mental health. The Tribunal had to evaluate the credibility of Mr. Church’s claims and the historical discrepancies in his account. Additionally, the Tribunal examined the Commission’s decision to deny the applicant’s claims for clinical worsening and the connection between his conditions and his service. The Tribunal found that the Commission had not properly considered the evidence and the relevant legal principles in reaching its decision.
In its reasoning, the Tribunal determined that Mr. Church had indeed experienced a clinical worsening of his PTSD condition as a consequence of his operational service. Furthermore, the Tribunal found that his major depression and alcohol abuse were also linked to his service. The Tribunal was critical of the Commission for not adequately considering the evidence and for overlooking key factors in its decision-making process. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commission’s decision and ordered that the matter be remitted to the Commission for reassessment, with a date of effect of 14 October 2008. This decision ensured that Mr. Church’s claims would be re-evaluated in light of the Tribunal’s findings.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and decides in substitution that the applicant has experienced a clinical worsening of his PTSD condition as a consequence of operational service. His major depression and alcohol abuse conditions are also linked to his service as a result. The matter should be remitted to the Commission for assessment with a date of effect of 14 October 2008.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.