Chung v The King

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

CHUNG

v

THE KING

[2024] HCASL 293
S78/2024

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Basten A-JA, Campbell and Cavanagh JJ), dismissing an appeal against conviction following a trial by jury in the District Court of New South Wales (Sutherland SC DCJ).

  2. The proposed ground of appeal does not raise any matter of public importance. Further, there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal.

  3. Special leave to appeal is refused.

    Gageler CJ
    Gordon J
    Edelman J
    Steward J
    Gleeson J
    Jagot J
    Beech-Jones J

    7 November 2024

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Chung v The King and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] HCASL 293
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Chung, sought an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales, which dismissed an appeal against his conviction from a trial by jury in the District Court. The Court of Criminal Appeal had upheld the conviction by a majority decision. The application for special leave to appeal to the High Court was made beyond the statutory time limit, necessitating an extension of time.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal, given the statutory time limit had passed and the grounds of appeal did not pertain to matters of public importance. Additionally, the court had to consider whether there was any doubt about the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision.

The court found that the proposed ground of appeal did not raise any matter of public importance, and there was no basis to question the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision. Given these considerations, the High Court refused to grant an extension of time for Chung to seek special leave to appeal. The justices were of the view that the application did not meet the criteria necessary for an extension of time. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.