Chua v The Owners Strata Plan No 89866

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Chua v The Owners Strata Plan No 89866 [2019] NSWCATCD 85
Hearing dates: 6 August 2019
Date of orders: 8 August 2019
Decision date: 08 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: S Thode, Senior Member
Decision:

1. A hearing on costs is dispensed with in accordance with s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.

2. The applicant shall pay the respondent's costs of the hearing thrown away by reason of the late withdrawal, limited to three hours attendance and three hours preparation, as agreed or assessed. 

3. The application for costs is otherwise dismissed. 

Catchwords:

COSTS - Strata Schemes - withdrawal of application - special circumstances 

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013

Cases Cited:

Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty L TD [2014] NSWCATAP 120

Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs: Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997 ] HCA 6

Category:Costs
Parties: Siew Lee Chua (Applicant);
The Owners - Strata Plan No 89866 (Respondent)
Representation: Siew Lee Chua (Applicant)
DEA Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 19/29171
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

Background

  1. Proceedings SC 18/40601 were commenced on 18 September 2018. The applicant sought orders pursuant to s232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 for repair and maintenance of common property. The matter was listed for hearing on 15 April 2019. The Respondent was informed at the hearing that the application was “withdrawn” by the applicant. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the proceedings, such costs to be agreed or assessed.

  2. The applicant appealed the costs orders.

  3. On 4 June 2019 the Appeal Panel allowed the appeal and the costs order made on 15 April 2019 was set aside. The Appeal Panel ordered the parties to exchange submissions on the question of costs and remitted the matter for hearing on the question of costs only. The parties agreed that a hearing may be dispensed with and the matter comes before me today to be determined on the papers, without further need of parties to appear. I am satisfied that the application may be determined on the papers without further need of the parties to appear.

  4. I have received written submissions from the respondent dated 19 June 2019.

  5. I have received written submissions from the applicant dated 5 July 2019.

  6. I have received submissions in reply from the respondent dated 12 July 2019.

Orders sought

  1. The respondent seeks an order that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the proceedings.

The respondent’s submissions

  1. The respondent submits that the Tribunal should find special circumstances pursuant to section 60 (3) of the act warranting an award of costs.

  2. On 18 September 2018 the applicant filed a strata application in the Tribunal seeking orders under section 232 of the Strata schemes Management Act 2015 (the Act) relating to 3 matters:

  1. a water leak into basement parking spaces;

  2. a sticking front door;

  3. issues concerning…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Chua v The Owners Strata Plan No 89866 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] NSWCATCD 85
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales, the applicant, Chua, brought proceedings against the respondents, the owners of Strata Plan No 89866, concerning issues related to a strata scheme. The dispute centred around the costs incurred due to the applicant's withdrawal of an application under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996. The critical legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant, Chua, should be ordered to pay the respondents' costs, and if so, the extent of those costs.

The Tribunal examined the circumstances under which the applicant withdrew the application and whether these circumstances justified an order for costs. It considered the provisions of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and the relevant case law concerning costs in strata scheme disputes. The Tribunal concluded that the late withdrawal of the application did not constitute special circumstances warranting an order for costs beyond what was necessary to address the impact of the late withdrawal. It was determined that the applicant should pay the respondents' costs for the hearing that was rendered ineffective by the late withdrawal, limited to three hours of attendance and three hours of preparation, as agreed or assessed.

In accordance with section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the Tribunal dispensed with a hearing on costs. It ordered that the applicant, Chua, pay the respondents' costs of the hearing that was thrown away due to the late withdrawal, limited to the specified time of attendance and preparation. The application for additional costs was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. A hearing on costs is dispensed with in accordance with s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.

2. The applicant shall pay the respondent's costs of the hearing thrown away by reason of the late withdrawal, limited to three hours attendance and three hours preparation, as agreed or assessed.

3. The application for costs is otherwise dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.