FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CHU & LORDE | [2019] FamCA 560 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Parenting – interim application by the Mother to take the children on overseas travel – where there are final parenting orders in place – where the Father has limited contact with the children – where the Mother wants to travel to China for a dental surgery – where the Mother is not able to afford the dental surgery in Australia – where the Mother’s extended family reside in China – where the children will have the opportunity to experience part of their cultural heritage – where the Father says that the Mother poses a risk of non-return – where the Father says that the Mother is isolating the children from him – where it is in the best interests of the children for them to travel to China with their Mother. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC. |
| Kuebler & Kuebler (1978) FLC 90-434 Lees & Halstead and Anor [2018] FamCA 970 Line & Line (1997) FLC 92-729 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Chu |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Lorde |
| FILE NUMBER: | CAC | 478 | of | 2012 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 16 August 2019 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Canberra |
| PLACE HEARD: | Canberra |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Gill J |
| HEARING DATE: | 12 August 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Self-representing |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Self-representing |
Orders
The Mother is permitted to travel with the children R, born … 2008, and C, born … 2012 (“the children”), to China between 4 September 2019 and 5 October 2019, and to that end is entitled to remove the children from the Commonwealth of Australia.
It is requested that the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police remove the children from the Family Law Watchlist.
The Mother is at liberty to uplift from the Canberra Registry of the Family Court of Australia the passports of the children and to use those passports for the purposes of the proposed travel to China.
The Mother shall return the children’s passports to the Canberra Registry of the Family Court of Australia immediately following her return to Australia.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Chu & Lorde has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT CANBERRA |
FILE NUMBER: CAC 478 of 2012
| Ms Chu |
Applicant
And
| Mr Lorde |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The parties to these proceedings are, Ms Chu, the Applicant Mother, and Mr Lorde, the Respondent Father. There are two children of the relationship, R, born in 2008, and C, born in 2012.
The Mother has…
Continue reading Chu and Lorde
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Chu and Lorde [2019] FamCA 560
- Case
- [2019] FamCA 560
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether to grant the Mother leave to remove the children from the Commonwealth of Australia for the specified period and purpose. This involved considering the children's best interests in the context of international travel and the potential implications for parental responsibilities and the children's welfare.
Gill J granted the Mother permission to travel with the children to China, authorising their removal from Australia for the duration of the proposed trip. The court also ordered that the children be removed from the Family Law Watchlist, and that the Mother be permitted to collect the children's passports from the Canberra Registry for the purpose of the travel, with an obligation to return them immediately upon her return to Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Mother is permitted to travel with the children R, born … 2008, and C, born … 2012 (“the children”), to China between 4 September 2019 and 5 October 2019, and to that end is entitled to remove the children from the Commonwealth of Australia.
2.
It is requested that the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police remove the children from the Family Law Watchlist.
3.
The Mother is at liberty to uplift from the Canberra Registry of the Family Court of Australia the passports of the children and to use those passports for the purposes of the proposed travel to China.
4.
The Mother shall return the children’s passports to the Canberra Registry of the Family Court of Australia immediately following her return to Australia.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.