[2014] FWCA 159 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Christian Community Ministries
(AG2013/10437)
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES SCHOOLS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 13 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Christian Community Ministries Schools Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] The decision issued by Fair Work Commission on 13 January 2014 in [2014] FWCA 159 print PR546564 is replaced in its entirety as follows.
[2] An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Christian Community Ministries Schools Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Christian Community Ministries.
[3] On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Independent Education Union of Australia and Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 January 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE406253 PR546790>
- AGLC
- CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES SCHOOLS [2014] FWCA 159
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 159
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court was required to decide involved whether the applicant had complied with the procedural requirements of section 185 of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court had to determine if the proposed agreement met the criteria of being a single-enterprise agreement as defined in the Act. The court also examined whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employees and the employer.
The Fair Work Commission found that the applicant had not fully complied with the procedural requirements of the Act, particularly in relation to the notice and consultation processes. The court noted that while the applicant had taken steps to comply, there were deficiencies that needed to be addressed. However, the court concluded that the proposed agreement was consistent with the statutory requirements for a single-enterprise agreement and adequately balanced the interests of the employees and the employer. Given these findings, the court approved the application, subject to certain conditions being met to address the procedural deficiencies identified.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.