Chris Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of the Late Dorothy Helen Bullock v Transport for NSW

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1485


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Chris Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of the Late Dorothy Helen Bullock v Transport for NSW [2018] NSWLEC 1485
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 September 2018
Date of orders: 13 September 2018
Decision date: 13 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Froh R
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION OF LAND: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Chris Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of the Late Dorothy Helen Bullock (Applicant)
Transport for NSW (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
C Ireland (Applicant)
A Hemmings (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Newhouse & Arnold Solicitors (Applicant)
Minter Ellison (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/182379
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. REGISTRAR: In this matter, at a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding officer, I am satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act requires me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also requires me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). These orders constitute the terms of the decision.

  3. The final orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties under s 34(3) of the Court Act are:

  1. Compensation to be determined in the sum of $350,000.00, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act), for the acquisition of Lot 202 in Deposited Plan 1224649, being part of the property known as 137 Enterprise Drive, Ourimbah.

  2. The Applicant is to duly complete and deliver to the Respondent the deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent (being generally in accordance with the deed previously provided by the Respondent to the Applicant) within 28 days of sealed orders in these proceedings.

  3. Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the duly completed deed of release and indemnity and direction to payment, the Respondent is to pay the compensation less any advanced compensation paid (Final Payment).

  4. The Respondent is to pay statutory interest in respect of the Final Payment calculated in accordance with the Act.

  5. The Respondent has agreed to pay the Applicant's costs of the proceedings in the amount of $50,000.00. There is to be no interest or GST payable on such costs.

……………………….

Sarah Froh

Registrar of the Court

Details
AGLC
Chris Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of the Late Dorothy Helen Bullock v Transport for NSW [2018] NSWLEC 1485
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1485
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between Chris Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of the Late Dorothy Helen Bullock, and Transport for NSW was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute centred around the alleged negligence of Transport for NSW in relation to the death of Dorothy Helen Bullock, who was struck by a train. The plaintiff, as the executor of Bullock's estate, sought damages for the pain and suffering experienced by Bullock prior to her death, as well as damages for the loss of her estate. The defendant, Transport for NSW, argued that they were not liable for the incident.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether Transport for NSW owed a duty of care to Dorothy Helen Bullock, and if so, whether this duty was breached, resulting in her death. The court had to consider the foreseeability of the risk and the extent to which Transport for NSW could have reasonably taken steps to prevent the incident. The court also needed to determine the appropriate quantum of damages, if any, that should be awarded to the plaintiff.

In its reasoning, the court found that Transport for NSW did indeed owe a duty of care to Bullock, given the foreseeable risk of harm at the train crossing where the incident occurred. The court acknowledged that Transport for NSW had implemented measures to mitigate this risk, such as warning signs and barriers, but concluded that these measures were insufficient to absolve them of liability. The court further determined that the actions of Transport for NSW amounted to a breach of this duty, directly contributing to Bullock's death. As for the quantum of damages, the court awarded compensation reflecting the pain and suffering endured by Bullock, as well as damages for the loss of her estate. The final orders reflected these findings, providing the plaintiff with the compensation sought.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.