Choudhary (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 4567

27 August 2018


Choudhary (Migration) [2018] AATA 4567 (27 August 2018)

.

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Gagan Choudhary

CASE NUMBER:  1813542

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2018/1174363

MEMBER:Mark Bishop

DATE:27 August 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 27 August 2018 at 8:27am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) visa – evidence of Overseas Student Health Coverage (OSHC) provided – Decision under review remitted for reconsideration

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cls 500.215, 500.211, 500.218

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 21 April 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 12 March 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

  3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the applicant failed to provide evidence of Overseas Student Health Coverage (OSHC).

  4. The Tribunal resolved the review on the papers.

  5. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  6. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is the provision of evidence of OSHC

  7. On 13 August via email the applicant provided proof of OSHC in the name of Gagan CHOUDHARY  for the period 13 August 2018 until 13 August 2019 (Tf: 13).

  8. Given the above findings, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.

    DECISION

  9. The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    ·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Mark Bishop
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0