Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2011] AATA 361
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No. 2008/0916; 2008/0918 2008/0920 2008/4691
2010/3609
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) Re XIAO MEI CHING Applicant
And
AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Dr J D Campbell, Member Date30 May 2011
PlaceSydney
Decision 1. In respect of application No. 2008/0916, the decision under review is affirmed.
2. In respect of application No. 2008/0918, the decision under review is affirmed.
3. In respect of application No. 2008/0920, the decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof it is determined:
i. liability is accepted for the psychiatric conditions of pain disorder, panic attack with agoraphobia and major depressive disorder; and
ii. the matter is to be remitted to the Respondent in relation to the calculation for section 16 and 19 payments; and
iii. the Applicant is entitled to recover costs in the nominated matter in accordance with the Tribunal’s existing cost recovery instructions.
4. In respect of application No. 2008/4691, the decision under review is affirmed.
5. In respect of 2010/3609, the decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof it is determined:
i. the Applicant is entitled to permanent impairment payment in respect of an accepted psychiatric condition, nominated in the previous matter, with the level of whole body impairment determined to be 15 per cent; and
ii. the matter to be remitted to the Respondent for calculation of the compensation payment; and
iii. costs are awarded to the Applicant in relation to the nominated matter.
...................[sgd]...........................
Dr J D Campbell
Member
LONGTITUDINAL BACKGROUND
2. Mrs Ching was born in 1961. Mrs Ching commenced work in 1980 in Hong Kong initially as a customer services’ representative for an air freight operator and from 1983 to 1986 as a secretary to an executive. Mrs Ching migrated to Australia in 1986 and she commenced work with Australia Post as a mail officer at the Southern Suburbs Mail Centre in 1988. Prior to her employment, she underwent a medical examination on 24 November 1988, during which she denied any history of any disorder of limbs, anxiety, mental or other nervous conditions. No evidence of limb or mental or nervous disorder was found at examination on that day.
3. Following her employment with Australia Post in 1988, Mrs Ching undertook studies in accountancy part-time at Liverpool TAFE College. For the next ten years Mrs Ching undertook a wide variety of tasks, including forklift driving as a mail officer, and during this period she much enjoyed her work and the work environment. During this period, she suffered a small injury to her hand in 1996, which was of little consequence.
4. In 1999 Mrs Ching, as a result of a reorganisation within within Australia Post, was transferred to work at the South West Mail Facility at Rookwood. Mrs Ching, after a two day training course, commenced working on the Spectrum 10 machine, undertaking the tasks of coding, loading, clearing on a 45 minute rotational basis.…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read CHING And AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] AATA 361
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide if the employer was liable for compensation under various sections of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) for the bilateral shoulder injuries, left upper limb injury, pain, anxiety, panic, breathing difficulty, and other symptoms, as well as permanent impairment in respect of the bilateral upper limbs and shoulder conditions and a psychiatric condition. This involved examining the evidence and the decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) that had previously considered the matter.
The court concluded that the AAT's determination to cease liability for compensation in relation to certain injuries and conditions was incorrect. The court accepted liability for the psychiatric conditions of pain disorder, panic attack with agoraphobia, and major depressive disorder, and for the permanent impairment in respect of the accepted psychiatric condition, with a whole body impairment level of 15 per cent. The matter was remitted to the Respondent for recalculation of compensation payments under section 16 and 19, and the Applicant was awarded costs.
The court affirmed the decisions of the AAT concerning other claims, set aside certain decisions, and ordered that the matter be remitted for recalculation of compensation payments. The Applicant was awarded costs in relation to the nominated matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. In respect of application No. 2008/0916, the decision under review is affirmed.
2. In respect of application No. 2008/0918, the decision under review is affirmed.
3. In respect of application No. 2008/0920, the decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof it is determined:
i. liability is accepted for the psychiatric conditions of pain disorder, panic attack with agoraphobia and major depressive disorder; and
ii. the matter is to be remitted to the Respondent in relation to the calculation for section 16 and 19 payments; and
iii. the Applicant is entitled to recover costs in the nominated matter in accordance with the Tribunal’s existing cost recovery instructions.
4. In respect of application No. 2008/4691, the decision under review is affirmed.
5. In respect of 2010/3609, the decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof it is determined:
i. the Applicant is entitled to permanent impairment payment in respect of an accepted psychiatric condition, nominated in the previous matter, with the level of whole body impairment determined to be 15 per cent; and
ii. the matter to be remitted to the Respondent for calculation of the compensation payment; and
iii. costs are awarded to the Applicant in relation to the nominated matter.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.