Child Support Registrar and Cook

Link copied
Case Copied 14 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & COOK [2008] FMCAfam 599
CHILD SUPPORT – Contravention – reasonable excuse not proved – deliberate fraud or contravention – imprisonment – sentence suspended.
Family Law Act 1975, ss.112AA, 112AB, 112AC, 112AD, 112AE
Child Support (Assessment) Act1989, ss.3, 4
Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988, s.3
Dobbs & Brayson [2007] FamCA 1261
Elspeth & Peter [2007] FamCA 655
Sahari & Sahari (1976) FLC 90-086
Tate & Tate (2003) FLC 93-138
Applicant: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
Respondent: MR COOK
File Number: SYM 6865 of 2006
Judgment of: Altobelli FM
Hearing date: 28 April 2008
Date of Last Submission: 28 April 2008
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 12 June 2008

REPRESENTATION

Solicitor-Advocate for the Applicant: Ms Hawkins
Solicitors for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitors
The Respondent: Self-represented

ORDERS

  1. That the Respondent did contravene orders made 16 January 2007 without reasonable excuse and the application in this respect is proved.

  2. MR COOK  is sentenced to a period of imprisonment for a period of two (2) months, such sentence to be suspended upon the following conditions:

    (a)That MR COOK pay the debt due to the Commonwealth in respect of amounts owing under the registered maintenance liability of the Respondent as at 28 April 2008 ($37,369.43) within a period of six (6) months of the making of these Orders.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Child Support Registrar & Cook is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYM 6865 of 2006

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Applicant

And

MR COOK

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This matter is the hearing of a Contravention Application filed by the applicant, the Child Support Registrar, on 12 November 2007. The respondent is Mr Cook. The applicant alleges that the respondent, without reasonable excuse, failed to pay to the applicant the amounts payable under Order 4 of the Orders made by myself on 16 January 2007. In their entirety those orders state:

    THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

    1. There is owing to the Commonwealth in respect of amounts owing under the registered maintenance liabilities of the Respondent the sum of $23,213.68 (being $20,394.88 in arrears of child support and $2,818.80 in late payment penalties).

    THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

    2.  That the Respondent pay to the Child Support Registrar the sum of $23,213.68.

    3.  That the Respondent pay to the Child Support Registrar the costs of the Commonwealth fixed in the sum of $2505.00

    4.  That payment of the amounts payable in orders 2 and 3 herin[sic] be paid to the Applicant within 150 days.

  2. It should be noted that those orders were made after a hearing, and were not consent orders. On both occasions, i.e. 16 January 2007 and at the current hearing, the applicant was represented by Ms Hawkins from the Australian Government Solicitor and the respondent represented himself. He was assisted by a court-ordered Turkish interpreter.

Background

  1. The respondent is the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Child Support Registrar and Cook and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] FMCAfam 599
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between the Child Support Registrar and Cook was heard before a court, where the Registrar sought to enforce compliance with child support orders. The central issue was whether Cook had contravened specific child support orders made on 16 January 2007, and if so, whether this was done without reasonable excuse. Cook argued that he had acted reasonably in failing to comply with the orders. The Registrar argued that Cook had failed to make payments as required and had no reasonable excuse for this failure.

The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties to determine whether Cook's failure to comply with the child support orders was justified. The Registrar presented evidence of the outstanding child support payments and argued that Cook's failure to pay was not excused. Cook, on the other hand, presented evidence to demonstrate that he had attempted to make payments but encountered difficulties. The court weighed the evidence and concluded that Cook had indeed contravened the orders without reasonable excuse.

The court found that Cook's actions constituted a breach of the child support orders and sentenced him to a two-month imprisonment term, which was suspended on certain conditions. These conditions included that Cook pay the outstanding child support debt within six months from the date of the order. The court's decision emphasised the importance of adhering to child support obligations and the consequences of failing to do so. The orders clearly outline the steps Cook must take to comply with the court's decision and avoid further legal repercussions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the Respondent did contravene orders made 16 January 2007 without reasonable excuse and the application in this respect is proved.

2.

MR COOK is sentenced to a period of imprisonment for a period of two (2) months, such sentence to be suspended upon the following conditions:

(a) That MR COOK pay the debt due to the Commonwealth in respect of amounts owing under the registered maintenance liability of the Respondent as at 28 April 2008 ($37,369.43) within a period of six (6) months of the making of these Orders.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.