Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Ausgrid (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 63 Hearing dates: 8 May 2013 Decision date: 08 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pepper J Decision: Order 4(b) varied as sought in notice of motion.
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: application to vary final orders - application made by notice of motion within 14 days of orders being entered - application made by consent - orders varied. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 36.15(2), 36.16(3A) Cases Cited: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage and Ausgrid [2013] NSWLEC 51 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage (Prosecutor)
Ausgrid (Defendant)Representation: Mr R Verzosa (Solicitor) (Prosecutor)
Mr S Nash (Defendant)
Office of Environment and Heritage (Prosecutor)
Holding Redlich (Defendant)
File Number(s): 51112 of 2012
Ex Tempore Judgment
Ausgrid Applies to Vary Final Sentencing Orders
This is an application made by Ausgrid by way of notice of motion filed on 3 May 2013, that the Court vary order 4(b) made by it on 22 April 2013 in the judgment of Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Ausgrid [2013] NSWLEC 51 (at [112]).
The application is by consent.
Order 4(b) is as follows:
Pursuant to s 205(1a) of the Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, at its own expense, the defendant is to:
...
(b) within 28 days of the date of this order place a notice in the Koori Mail newspaper within the first five pages of at a size of a least a quarter of a page (18.6cm x 12.9cm) in the form at annexure A"...
Order 4(b) was agreed to by the parties.
It is proposed that order 4(b) be varied in the following way:
Pursuant to s 205(1a) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, at its own expense, the defendant is to:
...
(b) prior to 25 May 2013, place two notices in the Koori Mail newspaper, the first notice within the first five pages at size of a least 7cm x 26cm and the second notice on any page after page 9 at a size of at least 19cm x 12.9cm in the form at annexure 'A'"...
The reason for the required variation is contained in the affidavit of Mr Robert Moses sworn 3 May 2013. Mr Moses is Ausgrid's legal representative. In short, in seeking to comply with the Court's orders, Ausgrid representatives were informed by the Koori Mail that it was unable to accommodate a notice of the size referred to in the terms of order 4(b) in the first five pages of the newspaper within the requisite time (the newspaper is a fortnightly publication). It could, however, accommodate two notices in the sizes stipulated in the order as varied.
These facts were not known to the parties, and Ausgrid in particular, at the time the form of the publication order in the Koori Mail was being mooted before the Court at the sentence hearing.
The Court plainly has power under r 36.15(2) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 ("the UCPR") to make the variation because the prosecutor consents to the application. That rule provides:
36.15 General power to set aside judgment or order
(2) A judgment or order of the court in any proceedings may be set aside by order of the court if the parties to the proceedings consent.
Alternatively, because a notice of motion has been filed within 14 days of the final orders being entered, the Court has the power to vary the order pursuant to r 36.16(3A), which states:
36.16 Further power to set aside or vary judgment or order
(3A) If notice of motion for the setting aside or variation of a judgment or order is filed within 14 days after the judgment or order is entered, the court may determine the matter, and (if appropriate) set aside or vary the judgment or order under subrule (1), as if the judgment or order had not been entered.
Orders
Satisfied that the Court has the power to make the variation and that in all the circumstances to do so is an appropriate exercise of the Court's discretion, I order that:
(1) order 4(b) of the judgment made on 22 April 2013 be set aside and in lieu thereof, the following order be made:
"prior to 25 May 2013, place two notices in the Koori Mail newspaper, the first notice within the first five pages at a size of at least 7cm x 26cm and the second notice on any page after page 9 at a size of at least 19cm x 12.9cm in the form at annexure 'A'."
**********
- AGLC
- Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Ausgrid (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 63
- Case
- [2013] NSWLEC 63
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Chief Executive had the authority to enforce the biodiversity offset condition under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The court needed to determine if the condition was valid and enforceable, and whether the Chief Executive's actions in attempting to enforce the condition were within the scope of their statutory powers. Additionally, the court examined whether Ausgrid had fulfilled its obligations under the condition and the relevant environmental laws.
The court found that the Chief Executive had the authority to enforce the biodiversity offset condition as it was a valid and enforceable condition of Ausgrid’s development consent. The court held that the Chief Executive's actions in attempting to enforce the condition were within the scope of their statutory powers. The court also determined that Ausgrid had not adequately fulfilled its obligations under the condition, leading to the enforcement action. Consequently, the court varied Order 4(b) as sought in the notice of motion, affirming the Chief Executive's authority to enforce the biodiversity offset condition.
Orders
Orders of the court
Order 4(b) varied as sought in notice of motion.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.