Chia (Migration)
[2018] AATA 2871
•21 May 2018
Chia (Migration) [2018] AATA 2871 (21 May 2018)
CORRIGENDUM
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Chiun Hang Chia
CASE NUMBER: 1805808
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/4169076
MEMBER:Wendy Banfield
DATE OF DECISION: 21 May 2018
DATE CORRIGENDUM
SIGNED:13 August 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
AMENDMENT: The following corrections are made to the decision:
on the cover sheet the decision should read as 21 May 2018.
Wendy Banfield
MemberDECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Chiun Hang Chia
CASE NUMBER: 1805808
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/4169076
MEMBER:Wendy Banfield
DATE:21 May 2019
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 21 May 2018 at 7:32pm
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – Evidence of adequate health insurance not provided to the Department – Evidence subsequently provided to the Tribunal – Decision remitted with directionLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 500.215STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 8 November 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 19 February 2018.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of adequate arrangements in Australia for health insurance during the period of the applicant’s intended stay was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
On 14 May 2018 the Tribunal received Confirmation of Health Cover in the name of the applicant for the period 21 February 2018 to 14 September 2019. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.215 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Wendy Banfield
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0