| [2014] FWCA 5404 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Chevron Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Argyle Trust
(AG2014/6876)
CHEVRON CORPORATION AS TRUSTEE FOR ARGYLE UNIT TRUST (TRADING AS LIFEVIEW - ARGYLE COURT), ANMF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 18 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Chevron Corporation as Trustee for Argyle Unit Trust (trading as Lifeview - Argyle Court), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 18 July 2014 Chevron Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Argyle Trust (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Chevron Corporation as Trustee for Argyle Unit Trust (trading as Lifeview - Argyle Court), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Health Services Union and Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 25 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE409525 PR554070>
- AGLC
- Chevron Corporation Pty Ltd as trustee for the Argyle Trust [2014] FWCA 5404
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5404
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Fair Work Commission had to address included whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not adversely affect the "no disadvantage test," meaning that employees would not be worse off under the new agreement compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to determine if the agreement had been fairly negotiated and if it contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions as stipulated by the Act.
In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission considered extensive submissions and evidence from both parties. The Commission noted that the proposed agreement had been the subject of extensive negotiations and consultations, involving multiple meetings and discussions over several months. The Commission also evaluated the provisions of the agreement to ensure compliance with the statutory minimum standards and the no disadvantage test. Ultimately, the Commission found that the agreement met all the necessary criteria and did not result in any adverse effects on the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.