Cheryl Tongia and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Case [2014] AATA 435


[2014] AATA 435

Division GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION

File Number

2013/6333

Re

Cheryl Tongia

APPLICANT

And

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

RESPONDENT

DECISION

Tribunal

Dr P McDermott RFD, Senior Member

Date 2 July 2014
Place Brisbane

The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.

............................Sgd.........................................

Dr P McDermott RFD, Senior Member

CATCHWORDS

CITIZENSHIP – Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea – Independence Day and automatic citizenship – Cessation of Australian citizenship – Application for resumption of Australian citizenship – Cessation outside legislative scope – Applicant ineligible for resumption – Decision affirmed.

LEGISLATION

Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea s 65
Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) ss 5, 10, 11, 17, 18, 20, 23
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ss 3, 21, 29, 30(1A), 33, 36
Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Nationality and Citizenship Act 1955 (Cth)
Papua New Guinea Independence (Australian Citizenship) Regulations 1975 (Cth) reg 4

Papua New Guinea Independence (Australian Citizenship of Young Persons) Regulations 1980 (Cth) reg 2

CASES

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex Parte Ame (2005) 222 CLR 439

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Walsh (2002) 125 FCR 31

REASONS FOR DECISION

Dr P McDermott RFD, Senior Member

2 July 2014

INTRODUCTION

  1. Cheryl Tongia (the applicant), has previously held Australian citizenship, and has made an application to become an Australian citizen again. On 18 November 2013, the applicant was advised that her application was refused by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. The applicant now seeks a review of that decision by this Tribunal. I thank the applicant for her courtesy to this Tribunal by attending the hearing of this application.

    AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP OF APPLICANT AT BIRTH

  2. In 1966 the applicant was born in Port Moresby in what was then the Territory of Papua. Upon her birth she became an Australian citizen because s 10(1) of the
    Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) provided that a person born in Australia after the commencement of that Act became an Australian citizen by birth. When she was born, the Territory of Papua was part of Australia. This is because s 5 of the
    Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) then provided that “‘Australia’ includes the Territories of the Commonwealth that are not trust territories”. Papua was not a trust territory.

  3. The exceptions in s 10(2) of that Act have no application to the applicant.

    EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE

  4. The Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, in s 65(1), provides that a person born in the country before Independence Day (16 September 1975) who had two grandparents who were born in the country or an adjacent area gained automatic citizenship of the new State of Papua New Guinea. The applicant has confirmed that she has at least two grandparents who were born in the country.

  5. Section 65(1) of the Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, is, by
    s 65(4) of that Constitution, expressed not to apply to…

Continue reading Cheryl Tongia and Minister for Immigration and Border Protec...

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Cheryl Tongia and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] AATA 435
Case
[2014] AATA 435
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cheryl Tongia sought a review of the decision by the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection that she was ineligible to resume Australian citizenship. The Federal Court of Australia considered the matter. The primary legal issue was whether Ms. Tongia's Australian citizenship, which ceased upon her acquiring Papua New Guinean citizenship on Independence Day, was outside the scope of the legislative power to provide for the cessation and resumption of citizenship.

The court examined the provisions of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007, including section 24, which deals with the cessation of Australian citizenship. It was established that Ms. Tongia's Australian citizenship ceased due to the automatic acquisition of Papua New Guinean citizenship on Independence Day, as per the Papua New Guinea Citizenship Act. The court also considered relevant case law, including the High Court's decision in Teoh, which sets out the scope of legislative power in relation to citizenship. The court concluded that the cessation of Ms. Tongia's Australian citizenship was not outside the scope of the legislative power, and therefore, she did not qualify for the resumption of Australian citizenship.

Having found that the Minister's decision was not erroneous, the court affirmed the decision under review. The applicant's application for the resumption of Australian citizenship was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

The applicant does not qualify for the resumption of Australian citizenship.DECISION I affirm the decision under review.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.