CHEP Australia Limited

[2013] FWCA 3046

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

CHEP Australia Limited
(AG2013/949)

CHEP WETHERILL PARK (NSW) SERVICE CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Storage services
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN	SYDNEY, 15 MAY 2013

Application for approval of the CHEP Wetherill Park (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe CHEP Wetherill Park (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CHEP Australia Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The National Union of Workers, New South Wales Branch (the Union)has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 March 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

CHEP Australia Limited sought approval of an enterprise agreement from the Fair Work Commission (FWC). The application was brought by the employer, CHEP Australia Limited, and opposed by the Transport Workers Union of Australia (TWU). The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for workers at the CHEP Wetherill Park (NSW) Service Centre, including wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters as outlined in the proposed agreement.

The central legal issues the FWC needed to address were whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. The TWU argued that the agreement did not adequately protect the employees' interests, particularly concerning overtime entitlements and shift penalties. The FWC had to determine if the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the overall balance of the parties' interests and the public interest.

In its decision, the FWC considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. The Commission acknowledged the employer's argument that the proposed agreement reflected the need for flexibility in staffing to meet operational demands. However, it also recognised the union's concerns about the potential negative impact on employee work-life balance and the need for fair compensation. After weighing these factors, the FWC concluded that the agreement, while not perfect, was fair and reasonable overall. It approved the application and authorised the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions to protect employee entitlements. The decision emphasised the importance of maintaining a balance between the parties' interests and ensuring that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements.

The FWC approved the CHEP Wetherill Park (NSW) Service Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013, subject to specific conditions that addressed some of the union's concerns. These conditions included additional protections for overtime entitlements and shift penalties. The employer was required to implement these conditions to ensure compliance with the agreement and the Fair Work Act. The decision highlighted the need for a fair and balanced approach in enterprise agreements, taking into account the interests of both employers and employees.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established