Chen v Cheng, Manager for China Town ANZ BAnking Group Ltd

Case [2001] QCA 381


[2001] QCA 381

COURT OF APPEAL

DAVIES JA
WHITE J
WILSON J

Appeal No 2531 of 2001

WEI XIN CHEN  Appellant/Plaintiff

and

VINCENT CHENG, MANAGER FOR   
CHINA TOWN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND      First Respondent/
BANKING GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 522)     First Defendant

and

CORALIE MOTT, MANAGER FOR WISHART
VILLAGE, KENMORE MANAGEMENT PTY LTD      Second Respondent/
(ACN 005 709 478)  Second Defendant

BRISBANE

..DATE 12/09/2001

JUDGMENT

DAVIES JA:  This is an application by a person Coralie Mott who is named as a respondent to this appeal that her name be struck from the action and that the name of Kenmore Management Pty Limited be struck from the action.

The order against which the appellant Ms Chen appeals is an order striking out her statement of claim in this action.  The defendants to the action were the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and a purported defendant Kenmore Management Pty Limited.  I say purported because the evidence before this Court now shows that there is no such entity as Kenmore Management Pty Limited.

Ms Mott was not a party to the action or the order made below.  Consequently she is plainly not a proper party to this appeal or the action and her name should be struck out.  As Kenmore Management Pty Limited is not a known entity and certainly appears to have been joined in error its name should also be struck from the action.

I would accordingly make those orders.

...

DAVIES JA:  An order in that form and no order as to costs.

‑‑‑‑‑

Details
AGLC
Chen v Cheng, Manager for China Town ANZ BAnking Group Ltd [2001] QCA 381
Case
[2001] QCA 381
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Chen v Cheng, Manager for China Town ANZ Banking Group Ltd involved an appeal by Wei Xin Chen against an order that had struck out her statement of claim. The respondents to the appeal were Vincent Cheng, the Manager for China Town Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, and Coralie Mott, the Manager for Kenmore Village, Kenmore Management Pty Ltd. The central issue was whether the order striking out the plaintiff's statement of claim was correctly made, and if the names of Coralie Mott and Kenmore Management Pty Ltd should be removed from the action as they were not proper parties. The court also had to consider the validity of Kenmore Management Pty Ltd as a defendant.

The court found that Coralie Mott was not a proper party to the appeal or the action and therefore her name should be removed from the proceedings. The court also determined that Kenmore Management Pty Ltd did not exist and had been joined in error, necessitating its name be struck out as well. The court concluded that the order to strike out the plaintiff's statement of claim was valid and appropriate given the circumstances.

The court made an order that Coralie Mott's name be struck from the action, as well as the name of Kenmore Management Pty Ltd. No order was made regarding the costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.