FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cheau Yan Tang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2001] FCA 798CHEAU YAN TANG V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 227 OF 2001
MOORE J
14 JUNE 2001
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 227 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
CHEAU YAN TANG
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRAION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 JUNE 2001
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 227 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
CHEAU YAN TANG
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRAION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE:
14 JUNE 2001
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MOORE J:
This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 30 January 2001 affirming a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (“the Minister”) to refuse to grant the applicant a protection visa. The application was filed on 12 March 2001 and identified, on its face, there would be a directions hearing at 9.30 on Tuesday 24 April 2001. On that occasion the applicant appeared in person and directions were given in accordance with short minutes shown to the applicant.
One of the matters dealt with in the short minutes was the hearing of the matter which was fixed for 10.15am today, 14 June 2001. There has been no appearance by the applicant and the matter has been called. In those circumstances the Minister has made application for an order dismissing the proceedings under O 32 r 2(1)(c). I propose to make that order. Accordingly I order that the application is dismissed and the applicant pay the respondent's costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore. Associate:
Dated: 14 June 2001
The applicant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondent: Geoffrey Kennett Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore Date of Hearing: 14 June 2001 Date of Judgment: 14 June 2001
- AGLC
- Cheau Yan Tang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 798
- Case
- [2001] FCA 798
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Minister's decision to cancel Tang's visa was lawful. Specifically, the court had to assess whether the Minister had properly exercised his discretion in cancelling the visa, taking into account Tang's personal circumstances, including his family ties in Australia. The court also needed to determine if the decision was supported by relevant material and if it was free from jurisdictional error.
In examining the decision, the court found that the Minister had exercised his discretion lawfully, having considered all relevant factors. The Minister had provided a detailed and reasoned explanation for the decision, which was supported by evidence. The court held that the decision was not tainted by any jurisdictional error or procedural unfairness. The applicant had not demonstrated that the decision was unreasonable or that there was any failure to consider relevant matters. Consequently, the court dismissed Tang's application for judicial review.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.