[2013] FWCA 5835 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Chatterbox Albany Creek Trust T/A Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre - Albany Creek
(AG2013/2317)
CHATTERBOX CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD CARE CENTRE - ALBANY CREEK ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Children's services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 20 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for variation of the Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre - Albany Creek Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre - Albany Creek Enterprise Agreement 2012 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by Chatterbox Albany Creek Trust T/A Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre - Albany Creek.
[2] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 20 August 2013.
[5] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE898704 PR540386>
- AGLC
- Chatterbox Albany Creek Trust T/A Chatterbox Child Development and Child Care Centre - Albany Creek [2013] FWCA 5835
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5835
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed changes to the Enterprise Agreement, which included alterations to employee entitlements and classification, were fair and reasonable. The applicants argued that the changes were necessary to address operational challenges and to align with industry standards, while the respondents contended that the changes would negatively impact employee conditions and were not justified. The FWC had to balance the need for flexibility in the workplace against the protection of employee rights.
The FWC carefully considered the evidence presented by both parties. It examined the economic context, the bargaining positions of the parties, and the impact of the proposed changes on the employees. The Commission found that while the applicants had demonstrated a need for some flexibility to remain competitive, the proposed changes went beyond what was necessary and reasonable. The FWC concluded that the changes were not fair and reasonable, and therefore dismissed the application. The FWC emphasised the importance of maintaining a balance between the needs of the business and the rights of employees.
The FWC's final order was that the application for variation of the Enterprise Agreement was dismissed, and the existing agreement remained in effect. The Commission highlighted the need for continued negotiation and good faith bargaining between the parties to achieve a fair outcome for all involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.