Chapman v Dickinson (No 2)

Chapman v Dickinson (No 2) involved a dispute over an accident that occurred at a worksite, with the plaintiff seeking damages from the defendants for negligence. The plaintiff, Chapman, frequently visited the site, performing tasks of his own choosing and usually receiving money for his work. The primary issues before the court were whether Chapman could be considered a worker or a deemed worker under the relevant legislation, whether there was a contract between Chapman and the defendants, and if the agreement was uncertain or if there was an intention to create legal relations. The court was also required to assess the defendants' claim of contributory negligence and determine the appropriate quantum of damages.

The court found that Chapman was not a worker or a deemed worker under the relevant statute. The court held that there was no formal contract between Chapman and the defendants, but there was an arrangement that gave rise to certain obligations. The court emphasised the intention to create legal relations and found that the agreement was not uncertain. In terms of contributory negligence, the court determined that Chapman had contributed to his injuries but did not bar his claim. Finally, the court assessed the damages and awarded Chapman $121,844.61.

The court's judgment was in favour of Chapman, with the defendants ordered to pay the awarded damages. The matter of costs was reserved for further consideration.