District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chapman v Dickinson (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 847 Hearing dates: 23, 24, 25, 26 November; 15 December (submission via email) 2020 Date of orders: 18 December 2020 Decision date: 18 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $121,844.61.
(2) Costs reserved.
Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – accident at worksite – plaintiff often visited the site and did tasks of his own choosing – usually received money - whether plaintiff a worker – whether plaintiff a deemed worker – whether a contract between plaintiff and defendant – whether agreement uncertain – whether intention to create legal relations – contributory negligence - damages
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002, s 3B, s 5B, s 5G, s 5H, s 5I, s 5R, s 16
Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 2A, s 151E
Workplace Injury Management and WorkersCompensation Act 1998, s 4, Sch 1
Cases Cited: Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424
Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424; [2001] FCA 1833
Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v Bridge [2018] NSWCA 183
Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2008] NSWCA 320
Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; [2002] HCA 8
GC NSW Pty Ltd v Galati [2020] NSWCA 326
Grills v Leighton Contractors Pty Limited [2015] NSWCA 72
Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44
Humberstone v Northern Timber Mills (1949) 79 CLR 389; [1950] VLR 44
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8
Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 32
March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506; [1991] HCA 12
Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227
Nominal Defendant v Rooskov [2012] NSWCA 43
Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34
Roude v Helwani [2020] NSWCA 310
South Australia v The Commonwealth (1962) 108 CLR 130
Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422; [1983] HCA 5
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Chapman (plaintiff)
Justin Dickinson (first defendant)
Annette Patrick trading as White Heavy Haulage (second defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr R Goodridge (plaintiff)
Mr A J Parker (defendants)
Firths - The Compensation Lawyers (plaintiff)
McInnes Wilson Lawyers NSW (defendants)
File Number(s): 2017/265257 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
-
Intending no disrespect, in this judgment I sometimes refer to Kevin Dickinson as Kevin and Justin Dickinson as Justin for ease of understanding.
A. Introduction
-
Christopher Chapman suffered a badly injured arm on 1 September 2014 on a White Heavy Haulage industrial worksite and commenced proceedings for damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 against the business owner, Annette Patrick, and her son, Justin Dickinson, who was…
Continue reading Chapman v Dickinson (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Chapman v Dickinson (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 847
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 847
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that Chapman was not a worker or a deemed worker under the relevant statute. The court held that there was no formal contract between Chapman and the defendants, but there was an arrangement that gave rise to certain obligations. The court emphasised the intention to create legal relations and found that the agreement was not uncertain. In terms of contributory negligence, the court determined that Chapman had contributed to his injuries but did not bar his claim. Finally, the court assessed the damages and awarded Chapman $121,844.61.
The court's judgment was in favour of Chapman, with the defendants ordered to pay the awarded damages. The matter of costs was reserved for further consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $121,844.61.
(2) Costs reserved.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.