Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chapman Planning Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1487 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 11 August 2017 Date of orders: 05 September 2017 Decision date: 05 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chapman Planning Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Willoughby City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr G Christmas, Apex Law (Applicant)
Mr K Webber, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/105243 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
That development consent is granted to DA-2016/354 to carry out alterations and additions and use the building at 73 Reserve Road, Artarmon for the purpose of a child care centre subject to the conditions at Annexure “A”.
……………………….
Commissioner Chilcott
Annexure A (C) (357 KB, pdf)
Plans (8.31 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Chapman Planning Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1487
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1487
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine several key issues. Firstly, it had to ascertain the scope of the Council’s authority to modify a development approval, including the conditions attached to it. Secondly, the court had to interpret the relevant planning and development legislation and the conditions of the approval itself. Thirdly, the court needed to consider whether the Council's actions were lawful and whether they were within the powers granted by statute.
The court held that the Council did not have the authority to unilaterally modify the conditions of the development approval. The decision was based on a detailed interpretation of the relevant planning legislation and the specific terms of the approval. The court found that the Council’s actions exceeded its statutory powers and amounted to an unlawful modification of the approval. The court further found that Chapman Planning Pty Ltd had suffered prejudice as a result of the Council's actions.
The court ordered that the Council's modifications to the development approval were invalid and of no effect. The court also ordered that the original conditions of the approval would remain in force. Additionally, the court granted Chapman Planning Pty Ltd an order for costs associated with the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.