Chan v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

Case [1999] FCA 1634


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Chan v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] FCA 1634

ALLAN CHAN v COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
N 1290 OF 1999

TAMBERLIN J

SYDNEY
11 NOVEMBER 1999


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1290 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

ALLAN CHAN
APPLICANT

AND:

COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR
OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
FIRST RESPONDENT

PAUL CLORAN
SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 NOVEMBER 1999

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The applicant be released on bail on the following conditions:

(a)The applicant enter into a recognizance to appear in this court on each day upon which his Application for Review is listed for hearing until the hearing thereof is concluded or until further order.

(b)The applicant’s parents, Chan Chung Sang and Chan Nora, enter into a recognizance in the sum of $75,000.00 each, secured of the property situate at 8/30 Dutruc Street, Randwick requiring the said Chan Chung Sang and Chan Nora to forfeit to the Crown the sum of $150,00.00 in the event that the applicant does not appear as required in paragraph (a).

(c)The applicant surrender his Australian passport to the court until further order.

(d)The applicant report daily to the Pennant Hills Police Station between the hours of 8.00 am until 8.00 pm.

(e)The applicant remain away from all places, including airports from which aircrafts or ships depart Australia for overseas.

(f)        The applicant reside at 57 Thomas Wilkinson Drive, Dural.

2.The hearing be expedited.

3.Leave be granted to the parties to approach the Registrar for a date for hearing.

4.Leave be granted to apply on 2 days’ notice.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1290 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

ALLAN CHAN
APPLICANT

AND:

COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR
OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
FIRST RESPONDENT

PAUL CLORAN
SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE:

11 NOVEMBER 1999

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter I am satisfied on reading the evidence and considering the documents which have been filed before me, particularly the evidence of Mr Gregory Walsh in the affidavit of 9 November 1999, that this is a clear case for the Court to grant bail to the applicant pursuant to the provisions of s 21(6)(f)(iv) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). In my view, there are extreme and special circumstances which justify adopting such a course and I note that the application is not opposed by the first respondent, and there is no other indication of any objection to the application.

  2. Accordingly, I make orders in accordance with the short minutes of orders which have been handed up to me with the addition of the additional cl 1(f), and I also make an order that the hearing be expedited and that leave be granted to the parties to approach the Registrar for a date for hearing.  Liberty to apply on two days' notice in relation to the working out of any of the orders is reserved.

  3. I will sign those orders and appropriate arrangements can then be made with the Registry for the taking out of the formal orders.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.

Associate:

Dated:             23 November 1999

Solicitor appearing for the Applicant: G Walsh
Solicitor for the Applicant: Greg Walsh & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: M Poberezny
Solicitor for the Respondent: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Date of Hearing: 11 November 1999
Date of Judgment: 11 November 1999
Details
AGLC
Chan v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] FCA 1634
Case
[1999] FCA 1634
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Chan v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions involved an application for bail by Chan, who was facing criminal charges. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The key legal issues before the court were whether Chan met the criteria for bail under the Bail Act 1976 (NSW) and, if so, what conditions should be imposed to ensure his appearance in court and to prevent any potential flight risk.

The court considered the nature and seriousness of the charges against Chan, as well as the risk he posed to the community and the likelihood of him appearing in court if released on bail. The applicant's parents agreed to provide a significant financial surety, and the court was satisfied that Chan would not pose a flight risk or interfere with witnesses if granted bail. The court emphasised the need to balance the presumption of innocence with the public interest in preventing crime and ensuring the orderly administration of justice.

In light of these considerations, the court granted Chan's application for bail, imposing strict conditions designed to mitigate any potential risks. These conditions included entering into a recognizance, surrendering his passport, reporting to police daily, and residing at a specified address. The court also expedited the hearing and granted leave for the parties to approach the Registrar for a date and to apply on short notice. The orders reflect the court's careful assessment of the applicant's circumstances and its commitment to ensuring justice is served while protecting the rights of the accused.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The applicant be released on bail on the following conditions:

(a) The applicant enter into a recognizance to appear in this court on each day upon which his Application for Review is listed for hearing until the hearing thereof is concluded or until further order.

(b) The applicant’s parents, Chan Chung Sang and Chan Nora, enter into a recognizance in the sum of $75,000.00 each, secured of the property situate at 8/30 Dutruc Street, Randwick requiring the said Chan Chung Sang and Chan Nora to forfeit to the Crown the sum of $150,00.00 in the event that the applicant does not appear as required in paragraph (a).

(c) The applicant surrender his Australian passport to the court until further order.

(d) The applicant report daily to the Pennant Hills Police Station between the hours of 8.00 am until 8.00 pm.

(e) The applicant remain away from all places, including airports from which aircrafts or ships depart Australia for overseas.

(f) The applicant reside at 57 Thomas Wilkinson Drive, Dural.

2. The hearing be expedited.

3. Leave be granted to the parties to approach the Registrar for a date for hearing.

4. Leave be granted to apply on 2 days’ notice.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.