Chan & Anor v Ku-ring-gai Council

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

CHAN & ANOR

v

KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL & ORS

[2018] HCASL 21
S246/2017

  1. The applicants seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.  In our view, an appeal to this Court would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

V.M. Bell
15 February 2018 		G.A.A. Nettle
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Chan & Anor v Ku-ring-gai Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] HCASL 21
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Chan and another versus Ku-ring-gai Council and others pertains to a dispute where the applicants sought special leave to appeal from a judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The specific details of the underlying dispute are not elaborated upon in this summary, but it is clear that the applicants, Chan and another party, were dissatisfied with the Court of Appeal's decision and sought to escalate the matter to the High Court of Australia. The respondents, Ku-ring-gai Council and others, were the parties against whom the appeal was directed.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicants' appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. This is a critical threshold question under Australian law, as special leave is required for an appeal to proceed to the High Court, and it is only granted if the appeal has a reasonable chance of success. The court was tasked with determining if the appeal met this stringent criterion.

The court's reasoning indicated that the applicants' appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The detailed reasoning behind this conclusion was not provided in the summary, but the outcome reflects that the court found the appeal unlikely to succeed on its merits or in making a significant contribution to the development of the law. As a result, the application for special leave was dismissed.

Pursuant to the relevant rules of the High Court, the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This means that not only was the application unsuccessful, but the applicants were also required to pay the legal costs associated with the application, which underscores the seriousness of the court's decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.