Reported Decision: (2007) 151 LGERA 92
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Garrett v Williams, Craig Walter [2007] NSWLEC 96 PARTIES: PROSECUTOR
DEFENDANT
Stephen Garrett
Craig Walter WilliamsFILE NUMBER(S): 50015; 50016; 50017 of 2005 CORAM: Preston CJ KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- destroy Aboriginal objects - damage Aboriginal place - pleas of guilty - restorative justice intervention by Court prior to sentence - restorative process of victim/offender mediation - voluntary participation by Aboriginal people of area in which offences occurred and offender in restorative conference assisted by trained facilitator - relevance to sentencing considerations LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 3A, s 5(1), s 21A(2), s 21A(3), s 22(1), s 23
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) s 2A(1), s 84, s 90(1)-(5), Pt 6.CASES CITED: Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 (17 August 2006);
Douar v The Queen (2005) 159 A Crim R 154;
R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220;
R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381 (30 November 2006);
R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383DATES OF HEARING: 28/09/2006, 29/09/2006, 05/10/2006, 09/10/2006, 10/10/2006, 14/12/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
27 February 2007LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: PROSECUTOR
Ms E Fullerton SC with Mr T Howard
SOLICITORS
Department of Environment and ConservationDEFENDANT
Mr P Clay (barrister)
SOLICITORS
Herbert Geer & Rundle
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESPRESTON CJ
27 FEBRUARY 2007
50015, 50016 and 50017 OF 2005
STEPHEN GARRETT V CRAIG WALTER WILLIAMS
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: The Aboriginal people have inhabited the country around Broken Hill in far western New South Wales for tens of thousands of years. Evidence of their habitation continues today. There are artefacts scattered across the countryside. The artefacts include evidence of quartz stone quarrying, working and tool manufacture, such as stone blades, flakes, cores or flaked pieces. There are ovens and food processing equipment including grinding dishes and mortar and pestle type equipment. But the most tangible evidence to the Aboriginal people is the country itself and its landscape features. Prominent amongst the landscape features is what European settlers named the Pinnacles. The Pinnacles are three unusual pointy hills that dominate the skyline south of Broken Hill. To the Aboriginal people, the Pinnacles are central to a living Bronze Wing Pigeon story line.
2 The importance to the Aboriginal people of the country around the Pinnacles was recognised in 1996 by a declaration that the Pinnacles be an Aboriginal place protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW).
3 The rocks and landforms that are important to the Aboriginal people have also attracted the interest of geologists and miners. The geology of the Broken Hill area is rich with valuable base metals particularly silver, lead and zinc. The area has become one of Australia’s most important mining areas.
4 One of the mines established was Pinnacle Mines. As the name suggests, it is based in and around…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Chamwell Pty Limited v Strathfield Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] NSWLEC 96
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In determining the appropriate sentence, the court considered the objectives of sentencing, including deterrence, denunciation, and punishment. The court decided that a fine was the appropriate penalty for each offence, with discounts applied for the defendant's plea of guilty. The court also considered the costs incurred by the defendant as a result of the restorative justice conference, as well as the offers made by the defendant to the Aboriginal people of the area. The final orders included fines for each offence, as well as an order for the defendant to pay the prosecutor's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.