CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2)

Case [2008] FMCAfam 748


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2) [2008] FMCAfam 748
FAMILY LAW – Contravention – no reasonable excuse.
Family Law Act1975, ss.60CC, 60DAA, 70NEA, 70NEB
Sandler v Kerrington [2007] FamCA 479
In the marriage of Rice and Asplund (1978) 6 Fam LR 570
Applicant: MR CHALK
Respondent: MS CAMDEN
File number: BRC 3435 of 2008
Judgment of: Jarrett FM
Hearing date: 23 May, 2008
Date of last submission: 23 May, 2008
Delivered at: Brisbane
Delivered on: 23 May, 2008

REPRESENTATION

Mr Chalk appears on his own behalf
Solicitors for the Respondent: Barry & Nilsson

ORDERS

  1. That the orders made in the Family Court of Australia at Sydney on


    25 June 2004

    be varied as follows by inserting the following:

    “2A   That the children [X] born [in] 1997 and [Y] born [in] 2000 return to [S] School for the commencement of Semester 2 or Term 3 however so described by that institution following the mid year holiday period 2008.

    2B    That the children shall thereafter remain at the said school and not be removed there from without the written consent of both parties.”

  2. That pursuant to section 70NEB of the Family Law Act1975, the mother enter into a bond.

  3. That within seven (7) days of the date of this order both parties contact the Relationships Australia (or their nominee) on telephone number 1300 364 277 for intake in the “Keeping Up Contact” Program or such other Parenting Orders Program as recommended by that organisation.

  4. That the parties shall comply with any reasonable direction of the Program Co-ordinator and in particular:

    (a)attend as requested for the purposes of assessment as to whether they are suitable for participation in the program;

    (b)advise the Co-ordinator of their contact telephone number and advise the Co-ordinator of any change in that number;

    (c)attend and participate in the program as requested including attending referrals to treating health professionals as recommended by the Program Co-ordinator.

  5. That both parties shall complete the recommended course within four (4) months of the date of this order.

  6. That in the event that either party refuses or fails to attend the program or any part thereof without reasonable excuse or refuses to accept a reasonable direction of the Co-ordinator, then the matter may be re-listed by either party on the giving of twenty four (24) notice.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Chalk & Camden is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
BRISBANE

BRC 3435 of 2008

MR CHALK

Applicant

And

MS CAMDEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Ex tempore

  1. This is the continuation of an application for contravention that commenced before me earlier this week, wherein I found that the mother had contravened some orders as alleged by the father without reasonable excuse.  The contravention alleged was that she did not exercise parental responsibility with him jointly in that she made a decision to change the schools of their two children…

Continue reading CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2) [2008] FMCAfam 748
Case
[2008] FMCAfam 748
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Chalk & Camden (No.2), the Family Court of Australia dealt with a dispute concerning the education and welfare of two children, [X] born in 1997 and [Y] born in 2000. The parents were in conflict over the children's schooling and participation in a parenting program. The court's task was to address these disputes by making orders that would ensure the children's well-being and the parents' cooperation in fostering a stable environment.

The primary legal issues before the court involved the children's education and the parents' obligations to participate in a parenting program. The court had to determine whether the children should return to their previous school and if the parents should be required to enter into a bond and participate in a program designed to help maintain their contact with each other. The court also needed to specify the conditions under which these orders would be enforceable and what the consequences would be for non-compliance.

The court ruled that the children should return to their school for the start of the second semester or third term of 2008 and remain there unless both parents consent to a change. The mother was ordered to enter into a bond, and both parents were required to participate in a parenting program within four months. The court emphasised the importance of both parents attending and complying with the program, warning that failure to do so could result in the matter being re-listed. These orders aimed to promote the children's stability and the parents' cooperation.

In conclusion, the court issued specific orders to ensure the children's educational continuity and the parents' engagement in a program to support their co-parenting relationship. The orders included provisions for the children's schooling, the mother's bond, and the parents' participation in a parenting program. Non-compliance with these orders could lead to further legal action.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the orders made in the Family Court of Australia at Sydney on

25 June 2004

be varied as follows by inserting the following:

“2A That the children [X] born [in] 1997 and [Y] born [in] 2000 return to [S] School for the commencement of Semester 2 or Term 3 however so described by that institution following the mid year holiday period 2008.

2B That the children shall thereafter remain at the said school and not be removed there from without the written consent of both parties.”

2.

That pursuant to section 70NEB of the Family Law Act 1975, the mother enter into a bond.

3.

That within seven (7) days of the date of this order both parties contact the Relationships Australia (or their nominee) on telephone number 1300 364 277 for intake in the “Keeping Up Contact” Program or such other Parenting Orders Program as recommended by that organisation.

4.

That the parties shall comply with any reasonable direction of the Program Co-ordinator and in particular:

(a) attend as requested for the purposes of assessment as to whether they are suitable for participation in the program;

(b) advise the Co-ordinator of their contact telephone number and advise the Co-ordinator of any change in that number;

(c) attend and participate in the program as requested including attending referrals to treating health professionals as recommended by the Program Co-ordinator.

5.

That both parties shall complete the recommended course within four (4) months of the date of this order.

6.

That in the event that either party refuses or fails to attend the program or any part thereof without reasonable excuse or refuses to accept a reasonable direction of the Co-ordinator, then the matter may be re-listed by either party on the giving of twenty four (24) notice.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.