FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2) | [2008] FMCAfam 748 |
| FAMILY LAW – Contravention – no reasonable excuse. |
| Family Law Act1975, ss.60CC, 60DAA, 70NEA, 70NEB |
| Sandler v Kerrington [2007] FamCA 479 In the marriage of Rice and Asplund (1978) 6 Fam LR 570 |
| Applicant: | MR CHALK |
| Respondent: | MS CAMDEN |
| File number: | BRC 3435 of 2008 |
| Judgment of: | Jarrett FM |
| Hearing date: | 23 May, 2008 |
| Date of last submission: | 23 May, 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 23 May, 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Mr Chalk appears on his own behalf |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Barry & Nilsson |
ORDERS
That the orders made in the Family Court of Australia at Sydney on
25 June 2004be varied as follows by inserting the following:
“2A That the children [X] born [in] 1997 and [Y] born [in] 2000 return to [S] School for the commencement of Semester 2 or Term 3 however so described by that institution following the mid year holiday period 2008.
2B That the children shall thereafter remain at the said school and not be removed there from without the written consent of both parties.”
That pursuant to section 70NEB of the Family Law Act1975, the mother enter into a bond.
That within seven (7) days of the date of this order both parties contact the Relationships Australia (or their nominee) on telephone number 1300 364 277 for intake in the “Keeping Up Contact” Program or such other Parenting Orders Program as recommended by that organisation.
That the parties shall comply with any reasonable direction of the Program Co-ordinator and in particular:
(a)attend as requested for the purposes of assessment as to whether they are suitable for participation in the program;
(b)advise the Co-ordinator of their contact telephone number and advise the Co-ordinator of any change in that number;
(c)attend and participate in the program as requested including attending referrals to treating health professionals as recommended by the Program Co-ordinator.
That both parties shall complete the recommended course within four (4) months of the date of this order.
That in the event that either party refuses or fails to attend the program or any part thereof without reasonable excuse or refuses to accept a reasonable direction of the Co-ordinator, then the matter may be re-listed by either party on the giving of twenty four (24) notice.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Chalk & Camden is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRC 3435 of 2008
| MR CHALK |
Applicant
And
| MS CAMDEN |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Ex tempore
This is the continuation of an application for contravention that commenced before me earlier this week, wherein I found that the mother had contravened some orders as alleged by the father without reasonable excuse. The contravention alleged was that she did not exercise parental responsibility with him jointly in that she made a decision to change the schools of their two children…
Continue reading CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- CHALK & CAMDEN (No.2) [2008] FMCAfam 748
- Case
- [2008] FMCAfam 748
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved the children's education and the parents' obligations to participate in a parenting program. The court had to determine whether the children should return to their previous school and if the parents should be required to enter into a bond and participate in a program designed to help maintain their contact with each other. The court also needed to specify the conditions under which these orders would be enforceable and what the consequences would be for non-compliance.
The court ruled that the children should return to their school for the start of the second semester or third term of 2008 and remain there unless both parents consent to a change. The mother was ordered to enter into a bond, and both parents were required to participate in a parenting program within four months. The court emphasised the importance of both parents attending and complying with the program, warning that failure to do so could result in the matter being re-listed. These orders aimed to promote the children's stability and the parents' cooperation.
In conclusion, the court issued specific orders to ensure the children's educational continuity and the parents' engagement in a program to support their co-parenting relationship. The orders included provisions for the children's schooling, the mother's bond, and the parents' participation in a parenting program. Non-compliance with these orders could lead to further legal action.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the orders made in the Family Court of Australia at Sydney on
25 June 2004
be varied as follows by inserting the following:
“2A That the children [X] born [in] 1997 and [Y] born [in] 2000 return to [S] School for the commencement of Semester 2 or Term 3 however so described by that institution following the mid year holiday period 2008.
2B That the children shall thereafter remain at the said school and not be removed there from without the written consent of both parties.”
2.
That pursuant to section 70NEB of the Family Law Act 1975, the mother enter into a bond.
3.
That within seven (7) days of the date of this order both parties contact the Relationships Australia (or their nominee) on telephone number 1300 364 277 for intake in the “Keeping Up Contact” Program or such other Parenting Orders Program as recommended by that organisation.
4.
That the parties shall comply with any reasonable direction of the Program Co-ordinator and in particular:
(a) attend as requested for the purposes of assessment as to whether they are suitable for participation in the program;
(b) advise the Co-ordinator of their contact telephone number and advise the Co-ordinator of any change in that number;
(c) attend and participate in the program as requested including attending referrals to treating health professionals as recommended by the Program Co-ordinator.
5.
That both parties shall complete the recommended course within four (4) months of the date of this order.
6.
That in the event that either party refuses or fails to attend the program or any part thereof without reasonable excuse or refuses to accept a reasonable direction of the Co-ordinator, then the matter may be re-listed by either party on the giving of twenty four (24) notice.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.