CGV18 v Minister for Home Affairs

The applicant, CGV18, sought judicial review of a decision made by the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) concerning their application for a Safe Haven Enterprise visa. The core of the dispute revolved around whether the IAA had correctly applied specific provisions of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) when assessing CGV18's claim for protection.

The central legal issues before the Court were whether the IAA had misapplied section 36(2)(aa) and section 36(2B)(a) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). Specifically, the Court was asked to determine if the IAA had failed to consider whether the applicant held a well-founded fear of persecution in the reasonably foreseeable future, and consequently, whether the IAA had made a jurisdictional error in its assessment.

Judge Humphreys found that no jurisdictional error had been made out. The Court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided text, indicated that the IAA had properly considered the relevant legislative provisions and the applicant's circumstances. The application for judicial review was therefore dismissed.