CFM

Case [2014] NSWCATGD 26


NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: CFM [2014] NSWCATGD 26
Hearing dates:11 July 2014
Decision date: 11 July 2014
Jurisdiction:Guardianship Division
Before: Boxall A, Senior Member (Legal)
Oxenham M, Senior Member (Professional)
Pickering E, General Member (Community)
Decision:

Limited guardianship order made for six months; private guardian appointed with accommodation, services, health care and medical and dental consent.

Financial management order made; private manager appointed; reviewable within six months.

Catchwords:

GUARDIANSHIP - application for guardianship order - capacity to make personal and lifestyle decisions - mental health issues - increased support needs - private guardian.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT - application for financial management order - capability to manage - potential need to sell property due to possible accommodation decision of guardian - lack of insight - rational appreciation of estate - private person - supervision of NSW Trustee and Guardian - reviewable order
Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Re GHI (a protected person) [2005] NSWSC 581
PY v RJS [1982] 2 NSWLR 700
H v H (unreported) NSW Supreme Court, Young J, 20 March 2000
McD v McD (1983) 3 NSWLR 81
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr CFM (subject person)
Mr KGM (applicant)
The Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and Guardian
File Number(s):56333
Publication restriction:Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal's proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).

reasons for decision

What the Tribunal decided

  1. The Tribunal appointed Mr NHM as Mr CFM's guardian for a period of six months to make decisions on his behalf about his accommodation, services, health care and medical and dental treatment as set out in the Tribunal's Order.

  1. The Tribunal also appointed Mr KGM as Mr CFM's financial manager, to be reviewed at the expiry of six months, subject to the authorities and directions ordered by the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

Background

  1. Mr CFM is aged 75. He is Swedish, but has lived in Australia for many decades, and his command of English is excellent. He lives in an independent living unit in a retirement village north west of Sydney. He has two sons, Mr KGM, who is the Applicant and seeks to be appointed as his father's financial manager, and Mr NHM, whose appointment as his father's guardian is sought by the Applicant.

The Hearing

  1. As a preliminary matter, the Tribunal considered whether Mr KGM had a genuine concern for Mr CFM's welfare, as required of a private third-party applicant under s 9(1)(d) and s 25I(1)(b) of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) ('the Guardianship Act'). The Tribunal was so satisfied.

GUARDIANSHIP

  1. The questions which had to be decided by the Tribunal in relation to guardianship were:

(1)   Is Mr CFM someone for whom the Tribunal could make an order because he has a disability which prevents him from being able to make important life decisions?

(2)   Should the Tribunal…

Continue reading CFM

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
CFM [2014] NSWCATGD 26
Case
[2014] NSWCATGD 26
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties in this case were CFM, an individual with mental health issues, and a private guardian and financial manager appointed by the court. The dispute centred around CFM's capacity to make personal and lifestyle decisions, as well as their capability to manage financial affairs. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court. The court had to determine whether CFM required a guardian to assist with personal and lifestyle decisions and if a financial manager was necessary to manage their financial affairs. Additionally, the court needed to decide the level of support and supervision required for both roles.

The court considered CFM's mental health history, their current capacity to make decisions, and the potential need for increased support. The evidence suggested that CFM had significant mental health issues that affected their ability to make rational decisions. The court recognised the need for a private guardian to assist with personal and lifestyle decisions, particularly in areas such as accommodation, services, and healthcare. The court also found that a financial manager was necessary due to CFM's lack of insight and capability to manage their estate effectively. The court opted for a private manager, with supervision from the NSW Trustee and Guardian, and made the order reviewable within six months.

The court made a limited guardianship order for six months, appointing a private guardian to assist with personal and lifestyle decisions, including accommodation, services, healthcare, and medical and dental consent. The court also made a financial management order, appointing a private manager to manage CFM's financial affairs, subject to supervision by the NSW Trustee and Guardian. The orders were made reviewable within six months, allowing for reassessment of CFM's needs and the appropriateness of the appointed guardians and manager.

The final orders included a limited guardianship order appointing a private guardian to assist with personal and lifestyle decisions and a financial management order appointing a private manager to manage CFM's financial affairs. Both orders were subject to supervision and review, ensuring that CFM's needs and circumstances could be reassessed as required.

Orders

Orders of the court

Limited guardianship order made for six months; private guardian appointed with accommodation, services, health care and medical and dental consent.

Financial management order made; private manager appointed; reviewable within six months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.