| [2015] FWCA 3085 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
CFC Consolidated Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2446)
CFC CONSOLIDATED PTY LTD & TWU - PILBARA DRIVERS AND FREIGHT OFFICERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 5 MAY 2015 |
Application for variation of the CFC Consolidated Pty Ltd & TWU - Pilbara Drivers and Freight Officers Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the CFC Consolidated Pty Ltd & TWU - Pilbara Drivers and Freight Officers Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by CFC Consolidated Pty Ltd. A list of proposed changes is attached to this decision as Attachment A.
[2] Pursuant to s.210(3)(b) of the Act, the Fair Work Commission extends the period for filing the application in this matter to the date on which the application was filed.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The application is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied under s.210 of the Act, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation made pursuant to s.210 of the Act operates from the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407446 PR567038>
ATTACHMENT A
- AGLC
- CFC Consolidated Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3085
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3085
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the proposed variations were fair and reasonable, taking into account the principles of good faith bargaining and the overall interests of the employees. The applicant argued that the changes were necessary to ensure the competitiveness and viability of its business operations. The Union, on the other hand, contended that the proposed changes were not in the best interests of the employees and did not reflect a fair and reasonable outcome of the bargaining process.
The Commission considered the principles of good faith bargaining, the overall interests of the employees, and the need for the employer to demonstrate that the changes were necessary to maintain the competitiveness and viability of the business. After examining the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission determined that the proposed variations were fair and reasonable. The Commission concluded that the changes were necessary to address the employer's business needs and were in the overall interests of the employees, given the current economic climate and the need for the employer to remain competitive.
The Fair Work Commission granted the application for variation of the enterprise agreement, allowing the proposed changes to proceed. The decision emphasised the importance of balancing the needs of the employer with the interests of the employees, and the necessity of maintaining a competitive business environment to ensure long-term job security and economic stability. The final orders included the adoption of the proposed variations, which were to be implemented in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the amended agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.