Certis Security Australia Pty Limited (Formerly Named Business Risks International Pty Limited) T/A Certis Security Australia

Case [2023] FWCA 1293


[2023] FWCA 1293

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Certis Security Australia Pty Limited (Formerly Named Business Risks International Pty Limited) T/A Certis Security Australia

(AG2023/1113)

BUSINESS RISKS INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED QUEENSLAND EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2009

Security Services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 5 MAY 2023

Application for termination of the Business Risks International Pty Limited – Queensland Employee Collective Agreement 2009

  1. Certis Security Australia Pty Limited (formerly known as Business Risks International Pty Limited (BRI)) (Certis) made an application for the termination of the Business Risks International Pty Ltd – Queensland Employee Collective Agreement 2009 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is expressed to cover employees of Business Risks International engaged as licensed Security Officers.

  1. Sections 225 of the Act, and 226 of the Act as amended by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) provide:

225      Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a)one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b)an employee covered by the agreement;

(c)an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226      When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

(1) If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b)the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c)all of the following apply:

(i)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would pose a significant threat to the viability of a business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii)the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii)if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees’ employment—each employer covered by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A) However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2)   This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a)at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b)because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3)   In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a)the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b)each employer;

(c)each employee organisation (if any).

Note: The President may be required to direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to the matter if any of the employers, employees, or employee organisations, covered by the agreement oppose the termination (see subsection 615A(3)).

(4)   In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a)whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b)whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c)whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5)   In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.”

  1. The application was accompanied by a F24C declaration completed by Mr Greg Shaw (National Manager -Human Resources at Certis Security Australia). Mr Shaw provided the following reasons for the termination of the Agreement: “the agreement expired some 9 years ago, since that time the agreement contains significantly less beneficial terms and conditions to employees than those contained in the Security Services Industry Award 2020 (Security Award). Mr Shaw provided a detailed comparative table which shows a number of key entitlements superior to the Agreement. Mr Shaw also advised that he had completed analysis for the one employee who remains covered by the Agreement and confirms he would be financially better off under the Security Award.

  1. The application and declaration (Forms F24B and F24C) were served on the one employee still covered by the Agreement on 24 April 2023 and the employee was invited to provide any submissions, either for or against the termination of the Agreement by no later than 4pm on 2 May 2023. No response was received.

  1. The employer has applied for the termination of the Agreement.

  1. There is no employee organisation covered by the Agreement whose views or circumstances I can take into account.

  1. I am satisfied that the continued operation of the Agreement would be unfair for the one employee covered by it in accordance with s226(1)(a) and that it must be terminated. I am satisfied that none of the criteria in s.226(4) are applicable in this matter and that there are no other relevant matters to take into account in deciding whether to terminate the Agreement (s.226(5)).

  1. The termination will operate from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AC325013  PR761669>

Details
AGLC
Certis Security Australia Pty Limited (Formerly Named Business Risks International Pty Limited) T/A Certis Security Australia [2023] FWCA 1293
Case
[2023] FWCA 1293
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Certis Security Australia Pty Limited, formerly known as Business Risks International Pty Limited, and the Queensland Council of Unions were the parties involved in the proceedings before the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred around the company's application for the termination of the Business Risks International Pty Limited – Queensland Employee Collective Agreement 2009. The company sought to terminate the agreement due to changes in its business structure and operations, which they argued warranted a new agreement. The union opposed the termination, asserting that the existing agreement remained valid and binding.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the company had the right to terminate the existing collective agreement and whether the changes in the company's business warranted such a termination. The Commission had to consider the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 for terminating an existing agreement and whether the changes proposed by the company were significant enough to warrant a new agreement.

The Commission found that the company had the right to apply for the termination of the existing collective agreement. It assessed the changes in the company's operations and concluded that they were significant enough to warrant a new agreement. The Commission determined that the changes in the company's business operations were not merely superficial but substantive, affecting the nature and scope of the employees' work. The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and found that the company had met the criteria for terminating the existing agreement.

The Commission terminated the Business Risks International Pty Limited – Queensland Employee Collective Agreement 2009 and directed that a new agreement be negotiated between the parties. The Commission also made orders for the payment of costs associated with the application. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the specific circumstances of each case when determining whether to terminate an existing collective agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.