Ceremonial - QCs-SCs
[2007] HCATrans 4
•29 January 2007
[2007] HCATrans 004
H I G H C O U R T O F A U S T R A L I A
CEREMONIAL SITTING
ON THE OCCASION
OF
ANNOUNCEMENT OF APPOINTMENTS
OF
QUEEN’S COUNSEL AND SENIOR COUNSEL
Coram: GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW J
KIRBY J
HAYNE J
CALLINAN J
HEYDON J
CRENNAN J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON MONDAY, 29 JANUARY 2007, AT 3.30 PM
The following Queen’s Counsel and Senior Counsel were present in Court:
Mr D.F. Jackson AM QC
Dr D.M.J. Bennett AO QC, Solicitor-General for the Commonwealth of Australia
Mr T.I. Pauling QC, Solicitor-General for the Northern Territory
Mr M.J. Slattery QC, President of the New South Wales Bar Association
Mr B.W. Walker SC
Mr A.W. Street SC
Mr M.W. Shand QC, President of the Victorian Bar
Mr G.C. Martin SC, President of the Australian Bar Association
Mr S.P. Estcourt QC, President-Elect of the Australian Bar Association
Mr R.C. Refshauge SC, ACT Director of Public Prosecutions
Mr A.M. Daubney SC, President of the Bar Association of Queensland
Mr B.A. Meagher SC, President of the Australian Capital Territory Bar Association
Ms S.J. Maharaj QC
Mr M.J. King SC
Mr D.G. Dalton SC
Ms E.A. Wilkins SC
Ms L. Flannery SC
Mr I.M. Neil SC
Mr G.J. Nell SC
Ms K.J. Howard SC
Mr A.E. Galasso SC
Mr N. Perram SC
Mr R.L. Hamilton SC
Mr A.S. Bell SC
Mr R.G. McHugh SC
Mr M.J. Leeming SC
Ms W.L. Pack SC
Mr G.H. Brandis SC
Mr G.P. Long SC
Mr B.J. Clarke SC
Ms L.J. Clare SC
Mr D.P. O’Gorman SC
Mr D.R.M. Murphy SC
Mr J.D. Henry SC
Ms K.A. McMillan SC
Mr A.W. Moynihan SC
Mr J.D. Montgomery SC
Mr R.H. Smith SC
Mr I.D. Martindale SC
Mr T.J. Margetts SC
Mr A.J. Kelly SC
Mr J.A. Dixon SC
Mr M.A. Gamble SC
Mr M.N. Connock SC
Mr P.M. Taft SC
Mr C.M. Caleo SC
GLEESON CJ: Mr Martin, representing the President of the South Australian Bar Association.
MR MARTIN: May it please the Court, I inform the Court that the following member of the Bar here present has been appointed as Queen’s Counsel for the State of South Australia.
She is:
Sashi Jass Maharaj who ranks in seniority after Maurine Teresa Pyke
GLEESON CJ: Thank you, Mr Martin. Mr Slattery, President of the New South Wales Bar Association.
MR SLATTERY: May it please the Court, I inform the Court that the following members of the Bar here present have been appointed as Senior Counsel for the State of New South Wales:
They are:
Michael John King who appears in the Bar list next after Richard Cobden
David Garrett Dalton who appears in the Bar list next after Christopher Michael Simpson
Elizabeth Ann Wilkins who appears in the Bar list next after David Garrett Dalton
Leonie Flannery who appears in the Bar list next after Elizabeth Ann Wilkins
Ian Malcolm Neil who appears in the Bar list next after Leonie Flannery
Gregory John Nell who appears in the Bar list next after Geoffrey John Bellew
Katrina Jane Howard who appears in the Bar list next after Robert Thomas Beech‑Jones
Adrian Erminio Galasso who appears in the Bar list next after Katrina Jane Howard
Nye Perram who appears in the Bar list next after Adrian Erminio Galasso
Roger Lyne Hamilton who appears in the Bar list next after Nye Perram
Andrew Scott Bell who appears in the Bar list next after Roger Lyne Hamilton
Richard Goffet McHugh who appears in the Bar list next after Andrew Scott Bell
Mark James Leeming who appears in the Bar list next after Richard Goffet McHugh
GLEESON CJ: Thank you, Mr Slattery. Mr Daubney, President of the Bar Association of Queensland.
MR DAUBNEY: May it please the Court, I inform the Court that the following members of the Bar here present have been appointed as Senior Counsel for the State of Queensland.
They are:
Wendy Lavender Pack who ranks in seniority after Peter John Dunning
George Henry Brandis who ranks in seniority after Wendy Lavender Pack
Gary Patrick Long who ranks in seniority after George Henry Brandis
Bernard James Clarke who ranks in seniority after Gary Patrick Long
Leanne Joy Clare who ranks in seniority after Glenn Charles Newton
Daniel Paul O’Gorman who ranks in seniority after Leanne Joy Clare
Douglas Robert Murtagh Murphy who ranks in seniority after Daniel Paul O’Gorman
James Dawson Henry who ranks in seniority after Douglas Robert Murtagh Murphy
Kathryn Ann McMillan who ranks in seniority after James Dawson Henry
Anthony William Moynihan who ranks in seniority after Richard Ian Mitford Lilley
GLEESON CJ: Thank you, Mr Daubney. Mr Shand, Chairman of the Victorian Bar.
MR SHAND: May it please the Court, I inform the Court that the following members of the Bar here present have been appointed as Senior Counsel for the State of Victoria.
They are:
James Damien Montgomery who ranks in seniority after Michael William Thompson
Richard Hunter Smith who ranks in seniority after James Damien Montgomery
Ian Douglas Martindale who ranks in seniority after Andrew Konstantine Panna
Timothy John Margetts who ranks in seniority after Ian Douglas Martindale
Anthony John Kelly who ranks in seniority after Timothy John Margetts
Jane Alison Dixon who ranks in seniority after James Harold Mighell
Mark Andrew Gamble who ranks in seniority after Jane Alison Dixon
Matthew Neil Connock who ranks in seniority after Iain Ronald Jones
Philip Mark Taft who ranks in seniority after Matthew Neil Connock
Christopher Mark Caleo who ranks in seniority after Philip Mark Taft
GLEESON CJ: Thank you, Mr Shand. Mr Jackson, do you move? Mr Solicitor‑General for the Commonwealth, do you move? Mr Solicitor‑General for the Northern Territory, do you move? Mr Slattery, do you move? Mr Walker, do you move? Mr Shand, do you move? Mr Martin, do you move? Mr Estcourt, do you move? Mr Refshauge, do you move? Mr Daubney, do you move? Mr Meagher, do you move? Are there any other motions at the Bar?
On behalf of all the members of the Court, I congratulate the newly appointed Senior Counsel. Your appointments are a public recognition of your professional eminence.
We are delighted to be joined on the Bench this afternoon by former Chief Justice Sir Gerard Brennan. A member of his family is among the recently appointed Senior Counsel for Queensland.
Until fairly recently, Senior Counsel was a term used in Australia to describe barristers who had been appointed by government to the rank of King’s Counsel or Queen’s Counsel. At the end of the 19th century, the office of King’s Counsel or Queen’s Counsel was described in a leading case as an office of the Crown and “a mark of recognition by the sovereign of the professional eminence of counsel upon whom it is conferred”. In the United Kingdom and Australia and many parts of the British Commonwealth it remains a formal status of eminence amongst lawyers; primarily amongst barristers. Until recently the appointments were made by governments acting in the name of the monarch. That has changed.
In recent years, executive governments in Australia have relinquished the power to appoint Senior Counsel, in some cases to the Chief Justice, and in some cases to the Bar. The rank of Queen’s Counsel was not abolished. It was not conferred by future governments, but the rank is retained by those upon whom it had already been conferred. Of course, the profession or the judiciary cannot appoint people to offices under the Crown. The title of Senior Counsel is now conferred on those identified by the Chief Justice or the Bar as the appropriate recipients by reason of their eminence. The profession competes internationally as well as nationally, and in that competition it is important that Australian advocates may still attain the same professional status as their counterparts in other places in the British Commonwealth.
It has been customary for Senior Counsel to make formal announcements of their appointment to the Supreme Court of the State or Territory in which they have their principal practice. Making such announcements in this Court at the commencement of law term came about with the development of a national bar. As in most federations, the Australian legal profession is organised and administered primarily on a State basis, but arrangements for reciprocity of admission and recognition of status, combined with a high degree of mobility between jurisdictions, mean that the Australian Bar has now become a national institution.
In no Australian jurisdiction has appointment as Senior Counsel ever been regarded as something to which a barrister is entitled simply by reason of long service. Persistence often leads to success, but not always. As any good advocate knows, inappropriate persistence may lead to disaster. At all events appointment as Senior Counsel is not intended as a reward for tenacity. It is a recognition of the professional standing of those whose learning, skill and ability have come to be regarded by the relevant appointing authority as warranting such a distinction. The appointment carries with it responsibilities as well as privileges. You now occupy a position of leadership in your profession, and your conduct will be taken as an example by others. Solicitors, members of the public and courts will place special reliance on your ability and, as a rule, the work that you will be given to do, and the cases that you will conduct, will be more onerous.
Most of you in Court today, and all of us here on the Bench, have travelled to be here. Some of you have travelled a long way. Coming to the nation’s capital and seat of government to make, or attend, these formal annual events itself signifies the national character of the legal profession.
The occasion marks something else that is equally important. It signifies the relationship between Bench and Bar, which is part of our legal and constitutional inheritance. You have all been admitted to practice as officers of a State or Territory Supreme Court. By virtue of that admission federal legislation entitles you to practice in federal courts. In whatever courts you appear, State or Federal, your overriding duty as advocates is to the court. The courts depend for their capacity to administer justice upon your skill and integrity.
In our legal system, most judges are appointed from the ranks of experienced legal practitioners. The professional strength and independence of spirit of the Bar sustains the strength and independence of the judiciary.
You have now reached a milestone in your professional careers. You are faced with new challenges and new opportunities. Some of you have been accompanied on this occasion by members of your family and friends. The Court is delighted to welcome their participation in this occasion. I trust that each of you will find personal and professional satisfaction in your new rank. Thank you for the courtesy you have shown in informing the Court of your appointments.
AT 3.45 PM THE COURT ADJOURNED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Constitutional Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
0
0
0